I like the guy (Fish), not enamored with the job he's done. Have we seen improvements? Of course, but have we seen stagnation if not outright decline in other areas? I'm afraid so. And to claim otherwise would be a lie. We were historically awful on 3rd downs, the pass game took a big step back even with the OROY at running back.
The team has been setback by QB woes, but isn't Fish partly to blame for not having a better plan than Clemens, Hill or Davis? 2013 I can forgive, but how do you not double down in 2014 when your LT and QB are recovering from ACL injuries?
Lastly, I've thought a lot about what impact a steady head coach has over the move process. I don't see how Fisher's continued presence past this year would make a difference. Sure, this offseason there will be a lot of noise, players relocating, new locale for camp and all that. Beyond this spring and summer though, we shouldn't need a babysitter for these guys, right? If it's another underwhelming showing for this team, should they really feel the need to hold onto the coach because there's a new stadium 3 years away? That seems crazy. Each year a new head coach starts somewhere in the NFL and integrates dozens of rookies and FA acquisitions to a "new city". This situation after 2016 isn't really that different. Certainly I don't think it merits an extension just because Fish has seen it before.