Anyone who doesn't consider how the move affected Fishers final season AND the year before is probably being a little shortsighted.
Didn't seem to.His record stayed pretty much on his 20 year average.
There was no opportunity for a fast turn around. This was a 3 year rebuild, whose intentions were NEVER really designed to create a winner while in St Louis. Fisher and Snead were tasked with building up the roster.
They were tasked to build up the roster,because they were starting at almost
expansion caliber personnel.
It had nothing to do with some elaborate design to not be successful in STL.
Dont lie to yourself and think that Kroenke wanted his team to have a good year in st louis. Specifically, a productive and even just slightly fun to watch offense would have been enough to bring fan interest back. Just a little offense and 9-7 finish would have would have been counter productive to Stan Ks ultimate agenda.
Stan may not have wanted his team to be successful during those years,but to say
he,Fisher,Demoff or Snead did things to intentionally sabotage the on field success
of this team is complete Bullshit.
This year we are enjoying many of the fruits of his labor, right on cue...
Right on cue?
Double Bullshit.
If you want to defend Fisher's accomplishments or effectiveness while coaching the Rams,
I am probably going to disagree with you,but I will respect your opinion.
But to say that there was some big scheme design played out by management and or coaches
to intentionally lose games is beyond absurd.
There was no smoking gun,no shooter up on the grassy knoll and
regretfully,there is no leprechaun in the cereal box.