Tight End Coverage Will Be Key

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
St. Louis Rams: Tight End Coverage Will Be Key
By Douglas M@thenovelroad

462035137.0_standard_709.0.jpg

Grant Halverson

hink there's one person in the NFL world who wouldn't mind if the hype of how great the St. Louis Rams defensive line may be could simply die away, and that's Jeff Fisher. He's spent the last two years adding to pieces-parts former Rams' head coach Steve Spagnuolo left behind, and done a pretty remarkable job. The problem though, is the NFC West is quite literally brimming with defensive talent across the board. Saying the Rams defensive front is "the best" will have the downright fearsome bands of defensive madmen in Seattle, San Francisco and Arizona simmering for a chance to slaughter Sam Bradford and Co., and prove just who really is "The Best in the West"...

Being ranked as highly as they are - by NFL pundits - is a balm to loss weary St. Louis Rams fans, but it adds pressure too. It will also shift offensive coordinator game plans, putting their focus squarely on a part of the Rams' defense that's unproven at the very least - the defensive secondary. What's more, the Rams will need to counter quick "bubble screen" passes, and double tight end sets. I think Jeff Fisher and Les Snead see the challenge of covering tight ends will be on the rise, and their recent draft picks paint a picture featuring strong safeties as more of a need than a center field/deep cover defensive back. Swarming around my cloudy mind is the prospect of - Gulp! - a kind of "bend, don't break" pass defense, with emphasis being put on the running game, and stopping short passes for small gains.

The giddy smiles of a few weeks ago - regarding the potential of the Rams defensive line - have faded a bit for me. While I love how deep in talent this unit appears to be, questions at other positions begin to peek out. For instance, based on what I can surmise, opposing team tight ends may very well be a key this year. Looking at the Rams linebacker corp and defensive backs, I began to consider the tight ends they'll be tasked to cover in 2014. Take a look:

San Francisco 49ers - Vernon Davis: In my mind, and based on his incredible talent set, he's one of the top 3 tight ends in the NFL. With 4.4/ 40 yard dash speed and size, Davis has been the only real receiving threat for the 49ers on a consistent basis. He's been "the guy" defensive coordinators have been game planning for when facing San Francisco the last five years. He has a 13.1 yard per catch average over the last 8 NFL seasons, and that's with defenses double teaming him - or at the very least chip blocking him - at the line on EVERY play. It's worked to an extent, but the 49ers have slowly added receiving options which could marginalize this ability to limit Davis. Trust me on this one: Jeff Fisher and Greg Williams have Vernon Davis high on there list of players to be concerned with this season...

Dallas Cowboys - Jason Witten - Destined for the NFL Hall of Fame one day, Witten may be getting long in the tooth now, but don't underestimate just how important he is to Tony Romo's offense. Witten has been a steadfast option for the Cowboys the last 11 years, and will be again in his 12th NFL season. His 879 career catches for 9,799 yards, 52 touchdowns - and an impressive 11.1 YPC average - mark Jason Witten as one of the very best tight ends in the NFL.

Denver Broncos - Julius Thomas - This is a monster Peyton Manning created. Thomas' 788 yards on 65 catches(12.1 YPC), yielded 12 touchdowns too. He's a beneficiary of Manning's ability to spread the ball around on any given play. The 2011 4th round pick out of Portland State exploded onto the NFL scene last season. He reminds me a bit of a younger Antonio Gates, with the ability to get down the field and make catches in traffic. A solid red zone threat, he'll wreak havoc on opposing defensive secondaries as long as he has Manning at the helm.

Arizona Cardinals - Rob Housler - Yes, they snagged Notre Dame's Troy Niklas in the recent draft, but that's not all they've done to insure Housler has both back up and challengers for the tight end position. John Carlson and Jake Ballard round out a stellar corp, and could signal a trend toward more double tight end sets in Bruce Arians' offense. They need to block for Carson Palmer to have any chance at surviving this season, and block they will. Housler is an offensive weapon many overlook due to his injury history. But I firmly believe he'd be a top 5 tight end in a different offensive scheme like New England's.

San Diego Chargers - Antonio Gates - Going into his 12th NFL, Gates isn't the tight end he used to be... Or is he? This is one of the best tight ends over the last decade, and any team who discounts Gates' ability to be a game changing factor does so at their own peril. His 719 career catches, and 9193 receiving yards for a 12.7 YPC are impressive. But it's his 87 career touchdowns that should keep defensive coordinators from taking the veteran Gates for granted.

Minnesota Vikings - Kyle Rudolph - Highly touted in the 2011 NFL Draft, Rudolf has been limited by quarterback performance in Minnesota. In 2012, when Christian Ponder decided to throw the ball Rudolf's way, the tight end from Notre Dame had impressive season numbers: 53 catches, 493 yards and 9 touch downs. Given the current quarterback situation for the Vikings, I can't help but think a health Kyle Rudolf will be thrust center stage once again. The Vikings are almost devoid of any valid wide receiver play makers too, which bodes well for a big season ahead for Rudolf...

Seattle Seahawks - Anthony McCoy, Luke Wilson and Zach Miller - Believe it or not, this may be the deepest in talent position on the Super Bowl Champion's roster. While McCoy's returning from an Achilles tendon injury suffered before last season began, he'd shown sparks in 2012 of being a solid red zone threat. Zach Miller is solid as both a blocker and pass catcher, and the second year Luke Wilson has shown sparks. I can't help but think this is a position head coach Pete Carroll will seek to both expand and exploit in 2014?

Philadelphia Eagles - Brent Celek and Zach Ertz - You might think the tight end position would be marginalized in Chip Kelly's fast paced offense, but it isn't the case. Celek, and the second year Ertz , have provided key moments for the Eagles. Combined, theses two tight ends tallied 971 yards, 10 TDs, and a 14.35 YPC, to go with 47 first downs.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers - Austin Seferian-Jenkins and Brandon Myers***Mike Evans?? - You're wondering why I have Mike Evans mentioned here, right? Well, the Texas A&M player is every bit tight end-sized, and I have to wonder if a sneaky offensive set with Evans position just inside a tight end to chip a defensive end, then flash out into the flats, is in the offing? Add in Tampa's other rookie - Seferian-Jenkins - and you have an intriguing duo who could present an incredible mismatch opportunity when they're on the same side. Don't discount Myers either; he's more than a bit capable of terrorizing opposing secondaries.

Washington Redskins - Jordan Reed - In nine games, Reed tallied an impressive 499 yards on 45 catches. The telling stat for Reed though, is his 30 first downs for a woeful Washington offense. Make no mistake: Reed and Robert Griffin III will be "best-est buddies" in 2014...

*************
The bottom line for the Rams' defense: Pass rushing is a great asset, but let's not forget just how wily NFL offensive coordinators can be. Pass coverage is something high of Jeff Fisher's list. But when you look at the Rams' defense as a whole, where do you see weaknesses other teams can exploit? Let me know in the comments...
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,699
We haven't had much of a problem stopping TEs in the past, heck just look at the number we did on Jimmy Graham last year, the best TE in the NFL. Outside of the Patriots game where he had 0 catches on 0 targets (he might've been injured, I'm not sure), we held him to a season low 2 catches for a season low 26 yards and even picked off a couple passes that were thrown in his direction, iirc.
 

ZigZagRam

Pro Bowler
Joined
May 12, 2014
Messages
1,846
One reason we've done so well against TEs is because teams have needed to keep one in so frequently to help stop our pass rush.
 

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 ROD Pick'em Champion
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
9,627
One reason we've done so well against TEs is because teams have needed to keep one in so frequently to help stop our pass rush.

Good point, and I do not expect that to change much this year. Arizona is the team that has really had problems with TEs in this division.....
 

CoachO

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
3,392
I may be in the minority here, but other than the one game that was sighted vs. J. Graham and the Saints last year, I think one of the areas of weakness in recent years has been the ability (or lack thereof) to cover TE's. Vernon Davis has had some monster games against us. As has Jason Witten. As good and Mikell was as an "in the box" run support/blitzing safety, his biggest weakness was covering the TE.

I think they drafted Ogletree and McDonald as a way of improving that area as much as any. Hopefully, with a year under their belt, they will continue to improve their coverage skills. Because, what most people fail to consider, its the "in the box" Safety who is responsible for the TE in coverage (unless he blitzing)
 

ChrisW

Stating the obvious
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
4,670
I may be in the minority here, but other than the one game that was sighted vs. J. Graham and the Saints last year, I think one of the areas of weakness in recent years has been the ability (or lack thereof) to cover TE's. Vernon Davis has had some monster games against us. As has Jason Witten. As good and Mikell was as an "in the box" run support/blitzing safety, his biggest weakness was covering the TE.

I think they drafted Ogletree and McDonald as a way of improving that area as much as any. Hopefully, with a year under their belt, they will continue to improve their coverage skills. Because, what most people fail to consider, its the "in the box" Safety who is responsible for the TE in coverage (unless he blitzing)

I trust TJ more than I do Og's......Ogletree is at his best, IMO, when he's the second guy to the ball for the strip. I know he has the tools to cover any TE in the league, I just don't think he's there yet.
 

CoachO

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
3,392
I trust TJ more than I do Og's......Ogletree is at his best, IMO, when he's the second guy to the ball for the strip. I know he has the tools to cover any TE in the league, I just don't think he's there yet.

I agree with you in that McDonald is better suited at the point. But seeing Ogletree run with Cook all throughout training camp was incredible to see. They would send Cook on crossing routes, and Ogletree was the ONLY LB on the roster who could run with him. It was fun to watch.

I think what happened last year, is Ogletree got caught up in the scheme of playing so much soft zone, that he was slow to react in many instances, which made it appear he was lacking in coverage.

When put in a straight man assignment against a TE, he will be VERY GOOD.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
I agree with you in that McDonald is better suited at the point. But seeing Ogletree run with Cook all throughout training camp was incredible to see. They would send Cook on crossing routes, and Ogletree was the ONLY LB on the roster who could run with him. It was fun to watch.

I think what happened last year, is Ogletree got caught up in the scheme of playing so much soft zone, that he was slow to react in many instances, which made it appear he was lacking in coverage.

When put in a straight man assignment against a TE, he will be VERY GOOD.

I expect his speed is goping to have Williams creating some blitz packages for him too. I think this is going to be a good year for AO because he will improve and will get used to attack the passer plenty.

In some ways the TE's the Rams play will have to be worried about that.
 

Merlin

Enjoying the ride
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
37,472
I'm not too worried about the Rams' ability to cover the TEs. Gotta agree with Coach that the 2nd year of both AO and TJM will make a big difference, but so will scheme overall and GDub's ability to prepare his guys for given looks and tendencies based on down/distance.

What I'd really like to see is COOK being on that list of TEs as matchup problems. Him running loose across the middle making plays would help this team's passing game a great deal.
 

CoachO

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
3,392
I'm not too worried about the Rams' ability to cover the TEs. Gotta agree with Coach that the 2nd year of both AO and TJM will make a big difference, but so will scheme overall and GDub's ability to prepare his guys for given looks and tendencies based on down/distance.

What I'd really like to see is COOK being on that list of TEs as matchup problems. Him running loose across the middle making plays would help this team's passing game a great deal.

I agree with your comment on Cook, but so much of that depends on what types of coverage teams throw at our offense. When Arizona, Indy and to a lesser extent Carolina played man coverage, we were very productive in running those crossing routes, and play action stuff.

When other teams played zone, and most of them did, our passing game, specifically Cook was not nearly as effective. Especially once Bradford went down. Cook could be a dangerous weapon vs. zone on the seam routes, and with a healthy Bradford, they should be able to utilize him.
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,699
I may be in the minority here, but other than the one game that was sighted vs. J. Graham and the Saints last year, I think one of the areas of weakness in recent years has been the ability (or lack thereof) to cover TE's. Vernon Davis has had some monster games against us. As has Jason Witten. As good and Mikell was as an "in the box" run support/blitzing safety, his biggest weakness was covering the TE.

I think they drafted Ogletree and McDonald as a way of improving that area as much as any. Hopefully, with a year under their belt, they will continue to improve their coverage skills. Because, what most people fail to consider, its the "in the box" Safety who is responsible for the TE in coverage (unless he blitzing)
I'm not sure where you're getting that idea from, but we've been pretty solid against TEs for a while now.

According to this list, for example, we were one of the best teams in the league against TEs through week 16.
http://www.junkyardjake.com/Matchup/DefVsOff/season1/te.htm
 

blackbart

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
6,242
Name
Tim
Love the point about Cook being on that list and how our defense will be matched up against a guy day in and day out during practice that will test them.

This team is beginning to have talent and depth all over the field. Practicing against each other will be great for learning and getting experience against top line performers, that has not been the case in StL over the last decade.
 

CoachO

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
3,392
I'm not sure where you're getting that idea from, but we've been pretty solid against TEs for a while now.

According to this list, for example, we were one of the best teams in the league against TEs through week 16.
http://www.junkyardjake.com/Matchup/DefVsOff/season1/te.htm

I was referencing past seasons more so than last year. I also made a point of stating the I felt Ogletree and McDonald were brought in with the specific purpose to help in defending the TE. I guess you didn't bother to read that part. Just throw a stat at it, and prove me wrong for a one year fix.
 

mr.stlouis

Legend
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,454
Name
Main Hook
LMAO i thought it was funny even though there is votes to delete it :(

Yeah, it was too good to pass up, though. Lol!

I swear I think of three a day but couldn't lay off that one. No offense to Sam, it's just straight up funny. ( Dang... there's another one. It's a curse...)
 

The Rammer

ESPN Draft Guru
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
2,400
Name
Rick
Yeah, it was too good to pass up, though. Lol!

I swear I think of three a day but couldn't lay off that one. No offense to Sam, it's just straight up funny. ( Dang... there's another one. It's a curse...)
:OT:lol!! I think it is to. Obviously your not being hateful but I think in life it's not a bad thing to look at humor in all situations even if it's not the " politcal " thing to do, hence all the dislikes...
 

mr.stlouis

Legend
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,454
Name
Main Hook
:OT:lol!! I think it is to. Obviously your not being hateful but I think in life it's not a bad thing to look at humor in all situations even if it's not the " politcal " thing to do, hence all the dislikes...

Yeah man, you gotta see the soul of a person. If Sam was sitting next to me I'd give him one of my beers and tell him to "go kick some @ss next year."

Yeah, totally off topic, though. I regress.

Go Rams!!!