Rams have no regrets about Redskins trade --Skins Do/ESPN

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
Rams have no regrets about Redskins trade
By Nick Wagoner

http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/14308/rams-have-no-regrets-about-redskins-trade

EARTH CITY, Mo. -- Although the St. Louis Rams have exhausted all of the additional draft choices they received from the Washington Redskins in the 2012 megatrade that landed Robert Griffin III in the nation's capital, they haven't yet received all of the dividends.

It hasn't yet been three years since the Rams and Redskins consummated the trade that sent the No. 2 overall pick in the 2012 draft to Washington in exchange for the Redskins first- and second-round picks that year and Washington's first-round choice in 2013 and 2014. More time is probably needed to determine a winner but from the Rams' perspective, it certainly appears to be shaping up as a major decision in their favor even if it doesn't reach knockout status.

“[We have] no regrets," coach Jeff Fisher said. "At the time it was a good deal for us and it was a good deal for Washington.”

At the time, it also appeared both teams were going to be set at quarterback as the Redskins got the chance to draft Griffin and the Rams backed Sam Bradford as their franchise signal-caller. What's interesting is that for all the players that ended up in St. Louis in the deal and even after Griffin's rookie-year success, quarterback is now a major question mark for both teams.

While quarterback has again become a need for both sides, the Rams are the team to come out of the deal with five current starters and eight players total after using those picks to make subsequent trades. Those starters include defensive tackle Michael Brockers, cornerback Janoris Jenkins, linebacker Alec Ogletree, receiver Stedman Bailey and left tackle Greg Robinson.

"It’s interesting," Fisher said. "We drafted eight players, seven of which are on our roster. But, I think you have to look past that. We’ve got defensive starters. More importantly than that because of those that we drafted through the trade with Washington, we were able to do some other things. For example, Zac Stacy was one of those players that we acquired through one of those picks. Without Zac here, it’s probably unlikely that we go and draft Tre Mason. We have depth there and we can afford to do that now. So, we’re able to shape our roster way beyond just the actual picks that we got from them.”

None of those players have yet developed into stars though Ogletree, Jenkins, Brockers and Robinson have showed varying signs of potential at different points in their young careers. Bailey has become a valuable piece of the offense in recent weeks and also looks to be a key contributor moving forward.

“How’s 'Tree' doing and [WR Stedman Bailey] 'Sted' doing and how's Zac doing? I think, Greg’s going to be our future left tackle for a long time," Fisher said. "I can’t say enough about it. Brock’s recent performance last week, we gave him a game ball. He had eight tackles and was a big factor in the ball game. Very pleased with how they’ve come along.”


Pead and Rokevious Watkins haven't contributed much and that combination remains the sore thumb of the group considering the Rams traded down in the second round to take Pead and recoup the pick they eventually used on Watkins. In doing so, they forfeited a chance to draft linebacker Bobby Wagner, who is now a star for division rival Seattle. Pead is on injured reserve but hasn't performed to his draft position when he's played. Watkins is no longer with the team.

Griffin, meanwhile, has not been the star that many presumed he would be for the Redskins. He did lead Washington to the playoffs as a rookie but injuries have slowed him and he's been benched for Colt McCoy in recent weeks. For what it's worth, Fisher believes Griffin could still get his career back on track.

“Any quarterback that’s going to go through significant injuries like he did and two offensive philosophy changes, scheme changes, I think that’s hard," Fisher said. "I don’t believe you’ve seen the last of him. I think he’s got a chance to be a really good quarterback.”

But even if Griffin does reach that level, Fisher, general manager Les Snead and the Rams will never look back at the trade as one they shouldn't have made.

=========
RG III trade hasn't worked for Redskins
By John Keim | ESPN.com

http://espn.go.com/blog/washington-redskins/post/_/id/13563/rg-iii-trade-hasnt-worked-for-redskins

ASHBURN, Va. -- The desire was understandable and remains so even now. The Washington Redskins needed a quarterback after going more than 20 years without one who could be labeled as a franchise guy. They had a bold, aggressive owner. They were within shouting distance of the top of a draft that, by all accounts, would yield two outstanding quarterbacks.

This was their chance.

But that's where it gets tricky. That's where the second-guessing enters, in a massive way. At the time the Redskins celebrated their trade with St. Louis -- giving up the No. 6 overall pick plus their second-rounder and two future first-rounders in exchange for the No. 2 overall choice. It was a steep, steep price to pay -- and one that, if the move failed, would haunt the franchise for years.

Selecting Robert Griffin III at No. 2 in the draft was a no-brainer. At the time there was debate about whether he should be rated ahead of Andrew Luck, who went first to the Indianapolis Colts. Heck, Football Outsiders echoed what many said: The trade was a risk, but Griffin was one of the best quarterbacks to come out of the draft in perhaps a decade. Not many disagreed with that notion, but giving up what the Redskins did to move ahead four spots was the tough call.

Even after the trade, it's not as if everyone said, or wrote, that it was a bad move. There were dissenting opinions, but certainly not all (my take: A necessary move given the chance to grab a guy who, by all accounts, would be terrific; yes, they paid too much but look at what had taken place the previous 20 years).

"It's been tough and I feel for our fans and in many times we haven't been successful and we're trying to get it right," Redskins general manager Bruce Allen said at the time of the trade, "and I think we had a big step to get it right."

The real problem occurred a month or so later. When the Redskins made the trade, they had approximately $40 million of cap space. But right before free agency began, the NFL slapped them with a penalty, taking away $36 million of cap room over the next two seasons. While the Redskins still had some cap space in 2012, a lot of it was devoted toward re-signing their own players. Had they known this, I doubt there would have been a trade -- then-coach Mike Shanahan would have pushed hard to block the deal. No one in the organization wants to talk about it now; head coach Jay Gruden obviously was in Cincinnati at the time and Allen has declined requests.

But when they initially made the trade, multiple sources say there was not unanimity, at least not among those below the front-office level. Those who had scouted the quarterbacks felt Griffin would take time to develop because of the system he played in at Baylor, a spread offense that had traditionally produced gaudy stats but few NFL quarterbacks of note. They knew it was a risk. They knew it could be a move that would make or break careers. There's a reason they still pursued then free agent Peyton Manning and drafted another quarterback that April (Kirk Cousins). Still, at the time, they expressed excitement about Griffin and what he could do.

After one year it looked as if it would make them. Coordinator Kyle Shanahan was praised for his offensive creativity and one member of the organization, after beating the Dallas Cowboys to win the NFC East title, said Griffin would "get guys paid." As in: promotions, whether in Washington or elsewhere. They knew he was a player still developing but one who had already delivered and, certainly, would improve. You can't rewrite everything on what Griffin has done in Washington, or what people thought two years ago.

Back then, he looked like the face of the franchise for a decade -- a successful player and marketing machine -- and maybe even the NFL. But one word followed Griffin before the draft that scared some evaluators and general managers at the time: durability. One scout said recently he never liked the trade because of concerns over Griffin's durability. Griffin is a lean guy who already had an ACL tear who liked to run. Tough combo.

Sure enough, Griffin has not played as well since tearing multiple ligaments in his knee during a playoff loss his rookie season. Whether that's the reason for his downfall, or the inability to develop in the passing game -- brought about, depending whom you talk to, by his injury or a belief that he was already at a certain level as a passer -- the fact remains that Griffin has not played well the past two seasons.

Now he's benched and his future in Washington is murky. Even if he remains here in 2015, which is not guaranteed, the coaches still feel he'll take a long time to develop.

The book is not closed on Griffin's story, but that story thus far suggests one thing: The Redskins struck out. They still have a need at quarterback.
 

Jumava1968

Starter
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
579
Name
Jumava
It was a lopsided trade from the get go and now it just sad, oh well C'est la vie.
 

mr.stlouis

Legend
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,454
Name
Main Hook
At this point, Greg Robinson for RG3 alone would be lopsided. I think it's fair to call it a grand slam for the Rams. Didn't hit on all the picks, but the score column is still heavily in Rams favor.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,941
Name
Stu
How many times have these sorts of trades worked out for the team trading up with multiple picks?
 

Blue and Gold

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
1,741
Name
B and G
Key phrase: "Selecting Robert Griffin III at No. 2 in the draft was a no-brainer. At the time there was debate about whether he should be rated ahead of Andrew Luck, who went first to the Indianapolis Colts. Heck, Football Outsiders echoed what many said: The trade was a risk, but Griffin was one of the best quarterbacks to come out of the draft in perhaps a decade. Not many disagreed with that notion, but giving up what the Redskins did to move ahead four spots was the tough call."
 

JoeBo21

Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
2,547
At this point, Greg Robinson for RG3 alone would be lopsided. I think it's fair to call it a grand slam for the Rams. Didn't hit on all the picks, but the score column is still heavily in Rams favor.

Also, without that #2 pick we probably would of taken a LT at 13.. so Donald for RG3.. whadda ya think? :ROFLMAO::D
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
Key phrase: "Selecting Robert Griffin III at No. 2 in the draft was a no-brainer. At the time there was debate about whether he should be rated ahead of Andrew Luck, who went first to the Indianapolis Colts. Heck, Football Outsiders echoed what many said: The trade was a risk, but Griffin was one of the best quarterbacks to come out of the draft in perhaps a decade. Not many disagreed with that notion, but giving up what the Redskins did to move ahead four spots was the tough call."

Every year we hear "best (insert position here)" and in the last several years there have been a few QB's that got that label.

None are playing this weekend.........wait Sanchez is a backup he is playing.
 

mr.stlouis

Legend
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,454
Name
Main Hook
Also, without that #2 pick we probably would of taken a LT at 13.. so Donald for RG3.. whadda ya think? :ROFLMAO::D

Great point, wow! Hadn't though of that. Rams probably would have picked Martin of whom they were very high on. It was rumored they were trying to trade back into the first round to get him. DL doesn't look nearly as scary without Donald's numerous impact plays this season.

Also, I bet we don't trade for Tavon, either. This offense is a lot less exciting without Tay Awesome in the mix lol. Tavon has done really well the last couple weeks. He looks like he's finally back to full speed after getting hurt.

I would say Brockers would still be a Ram.
 

Merlin

Enjoying the ride
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
37,471
The trade was a seven game sweep in favor of the Rams. It is going to go down as one of the most lopsided draft day deals ever.

Just wait until the Rams win their first Super Bowl with that core of players. It's gonna be even more fun to read about then.
 

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4
Key phrase: "Selecting Robert Griffin III at No. 2 in the draft was a no-brainer. At the time there was debate about whether he should be rated ahead of Andrew Luck, who went first to the Indianapolis Colts. Heck, Football Outsiders echoed what many said: The trade was a risk, but Griffin was one of the best quarterbacks to come out of the draft in perhaps a decade. Not many disagreed with that notion, but giving up what the Redskins did to move ahead four spots was the tough call."

What is funny is that there were plenty of people who disagreed with the notion that he was best in a decade, just no one wanted to listen. I remember talking about that trade in my break room at work. One of the comments I remember was, "they just gave away 10 years worth of players." That was too much to give up for any player. How can Joe Montana be Montana if you've given away the ability to draft Craig, Rice and the rest?
 

Irish

Starter
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
962
But the Rams do have a regret about the trade, and his name is Isaiah Pead.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
At this point, Greg Robinson for RG3 alone would be lopsided. I think it's fair to call it a grand slam for the Rams. Didn't hit on all the picks, but the score column is still heavily in Rams favor.

And I would submit that being able to draft G Rob there enabled us to draft Aaron Donald oops someone beat me to it.
 

Boat Ram

Recovering Lurker
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
81
I don't see how any one can argue that it's even close. Even if Rmeknee had worked out, we got 5 quality starters and more. The only argument you couldn't counter is he somehow got them to the playoffs the first year, I would argue that Morris had more to do with that however.
 

Boffo97

Still legal in 17 states!
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
5,278
Name
Dave
And I would submit that being able to draft G Rob there enabled us to draft Aaron Donald oops someone beat me to it.
Yeah, I was a big Watkins supporter, but I don't think we'd be able to take The Donald unless we drafted Robinson.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
I don't see how any one can argue that it's even close. Even if Rmeknee had worked out, we got 5 quality starters and more. The only argument you couldn't counter is he somehow got them to the playoffs the first year, I would argue that Morris had more to do with that however.
The only argument would have been that we should have pulled the trigger on RG and then gotten draft choices for Bradford who at the time would I'm certain brought a 1 and a 2 or maybe even more because Shurmer was the coach at Cleveland and they were I think going to give us 2/1 s for RG and I'm sure he would have been all up in the idea of having Sam.
 

Boffo97

Still legal in 17 states!
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
5,278
Name
Dave
The only argument would have been that we should have pulled the trigger on RG and then gotten draft choices for Bradford who at the time would I'm certain brought a 1 and a 2 or maybe even more because Shurmer was the coach at Cleveland and they were I think going to give us 2/1 s for RG and I'm sure he would have been all up in the idea of having Sam.
I'm not sure how much trade value Sam would have had because of his contract. Even if we did some sort of sign and trade deal, we'd be in cap hell on both contracts and the other team would still have a lot to pay since it's not like Bradford or anyone else would have taken a major paycut.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
I'm not sure how much trade value Sam would have had because of his contract. Even if we did some sort of sign and trade deal, we'd be in cap hell on both contracts and the other team would still have a lot to pay since it's not like Bradford or anyone else would have taken a major paycut.
Yeah that was the big bugaboo with Sam you couldn't afford to take him couldn't afford not to couldn't trade the pick for the correct value it we were in a corner , but the spitball arguments never include reality of the cap
As an aside I think Lovie ( ever think how cruel it was to name a kid that,why the hell not Sue) fucked up trading Barron for picks , as I recall he's pretty insistent on drafting players he wants (Damien Lewis, Arch,Robert Thomas ) and IMO most of his success in Chi was from players there when he got there and gave two firsts for Cutler, now he's in Tampa goes and gets McCown and names him the starter before camp,
 

Boffo97

Still legal in 17 states!
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
5,278
Name
Dave
As an aside I think Lovie ( ever think how cruel it was to name a kid that,why the hell not Sue) fucked up trading Barron for picks , as I recall he's pretty insistent on drafting players he wants (Damien Lewis, Arch,Robert Thomas ) and IMO most of his success in Chi was from players there when he got there and gave two firsts for Cutler, now he's in Tampa goes and gets McCown and names him the starter before camp,
In Lovie's (maybe his parents were big fans of Gilligan's Island?) defense, Barron was scheduled to be a free agent after this season, and if you're not planning to re-sign him, might as well get what you can from him.

It's like how we thought we got this great deal on Brandon Lloyd, then he didn't want to come back and we paid a 5th rounder for a part-season rental.