Rams and NFL interesting stats

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
OldSchool said:
Wagoner? I was talking about Myles though he was more of a JB Long predecessor
Click to expand...
Last two beat writers were actually Jourdan and Vinny. Myles was more of a media sideshow pony. But it's funny how far we have come since Wagoner's sorry ass.
 
  • 3Like
  • HaHa
Reactions: RamBall, BuffaloRam, RamFanWA and 1 other person
Flint said:
No love for Bernie?
Click to expand...
1762973602277.webp
 
HighDesertRam said:
Question: When Lake interception the football on the 2-point conversion play. Why doesn't that count as an interception?
Click to expand...
According to the search thingy:

In the NFL, an interception on a two-point conversion attempt is not recorded as an official interception in the player's statistics. The play is considered a point-after-touchdown (PAT) attempt, and as such, no individual statistical credits are awarded for interceptions, fumbles, completions, receptions, or yards gained during the attempt. The play is simply scored as a failed or successful conversion attempt.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: majrleaged, Karate61, Steve808 and 1 other person
RamFanWA said:
According to the search thingy:

In the NFL, an interception on a two-point conversion attempt is not recorded as an official interception in the player's statistics. The play is considered a point-after-touchdown (PAT) attempt, and as such, no individual statistical credits are awarded for interceptions, fumbles, completions, receptions, or yards gained during the attempt. The play is simply scored as a failed or successful conversion attempt.
Click to expand...
Thanks,
 
  • Like
Reactions: LARAMSinFeb.
DzRams said:
You realize his age is a double-edged sword? If we're using that as a basis to trade him away before he declines, another team would use that same point to give us something less than a "haul."

FWIW, Brian Burns was traded a few years back for a 2nd, a future 5th, and a swap of that year's 5ths. Of course, this was after the Panthers turned down 2 1sts from the Rams. Burns was 25 when traded.

I think we'll be disappointed on what we can get for Young.
Click to expand...
I dunno boss. Yes he'll be 30 -- in 3 more years. But, atm, he's 4th in sacks w/ 1 less game than 2 of the others above him. He arguably has less treadwear than the others -- he was 25 when he was drafted, and he's 27 now. He's ascending, with 9.0 sacks with 8 games left to play; 1 sack / game = 17.0 sacks. He had 8.0 & 7.5 sacks his 1st 2 years.
Brian Burns? never had more than 11.0 in his career.
T. J. Watt? averaged 12.5 sacks in 9 seasons.
I think it's entirely within the realm of possibility that we could get a 1st for him this offseason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DzRams
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back