Maybe this really is his last season.Stafford must be indicating he’s nearly done.
I certainly hope not, but it wouldn’t surprise me.
Maybe this really is his last season.Stafford must be indicating he’s nearly done.
Yeah, first time Sean doesn't look excited about the pick.McVay doesn’t look happy at all. Maybe I am reading too much into his facial expression and body language.
Wow! Well have a good life. Buh bye.I haven't been here for a while, but I absolutely HATE this pick.
We have a very short window to win the super bowl with Stafford.
I watched this guys highlights, and I don't see anything impressive besides his ability to run around.
Since when does that translate to success in the NFL?
It looks to me like an ACL injury in waiting.
Both Lemon and Sadiq were there for the taking, which would improve our offense dramatically this season.
With Puka one night away from a suspension, and Adams a year from retirement, either of those guys would make us a hugely improved team.
I honestly hope he tears his ACL and never plays a down for us. Fuck this pick, and fuck these idiots making these decisions.
Oh, and FUCK the people that run this board that delete posts.
It honestly feels worse than when the Rams lost to the Pats in the Superbowl.Wow. Really?
Right? You can go back and forth on who wears the pants in the relationship, but there is zero f**king way that mcvay can't pull his weight on a first round qbMcVay has more than enough power in this organization to veto that sort of move if he's not on board with it.
I don't think Les is the type of GM who shoves picks down his coach's throats, even if he had that power which I doubt he does. As I think the Rams are well aware that McVay is a rare head coach of quality and thus the power in this franchise. Keeping him happy is undoubtedly something that Les does very well.I’m telling you everyone doing the “see, this means McVay is sticking around post-Stafford” is reading this completely wrong. I think Snead knows McVay could bounce at some point. This pick is Snead’s off-ramp to a post Stafford era. I don’t think it’s McVay’s.
How were they wrong? He was drafted to be a backup.
And that is what he is
You think he was a wasted because he didnt supplant Stafford? Good grief
A terrible run-game for Bama, sure, (even though Jam Miller will likely be a UDFA pickup), but I refuse to say that they had "terrible receivers"; not with Germie Bernard or Ryan Coleman-Williams (who will likely be a top-fifteen-pick next year if he rebounds and does what he did his freshman year). Isaiah Horton and Lotzeir Brooks looked good as well.For the doubters: check out analysis by Orlovsky, Baldinger, Gruden, and many others who are sky-high on Simpson.
Bama had a terrible O-line, terrible run game, terrible receivers. Simpson was running around like a maniac making superhero plays.
Now Simpson will have a great supporting cast and a great system.
I bet most here are gonna change their tune on this guy.
From the draft videos it seemed to me that Bennett was really Snead's guy as a cheap long-term backup.A. Nobody was looking for a pro-bowler in the 4th...not sure where you got that from.
B. My point was that people basically say "trust McVay with QBs"...and I pointed out the fault in this logic.
C. You just proved my point with your Puka comment.
Disappointed is an understatement.
My guess is that has more to do with Stafford than anything else. If McVay didn't want Simpson we would not have taken Simpson.McVay doesn’t look happy at all. Maybe I am reading too much into his facial expression and body language.
You are the one who said "impact player." And I proved your point by pointing out that we drafted the only impact player taken after we drafted Stetson Bennett in the late fourth round? Okay. Good to know. McVay spending a late fourth round pick on a backup is not remotely comparable to spending a top 15 pick on a QB.A. Nobody was looking for a pro-bowler in the 4th...not sure where you got that from.
B. My point was that people basically say "trust McVay with QBs"...and I pointed out the fault in this logic.
C. You just proved my point with your Puka comment.