Projected Lineups: St Louis Rams

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
Projected Lineups: St Louis Rams
Nathan Jahnke | February 14, 2014

If the Rams lost all of their unrestricted free agents, didn’t re-sign anyone and didn’t draft anyone, their roster really wouldn’t look significantly different than the 2013 season outside of having Sam Bradford healthy. The Rams have built their roster with recent high round draft picks who will ideally continue to improve mixed with a few veteran offensive free agents that have panned out.

In a worst case scenario a lot of these young players don’t pan out and St. Louis has another losing season. In a best case the Rams make the right moves this offseason and can help keep the NFC West the best division in football.

Key:
- Player markers are colored per class on a five-step ‘Poor’ to ‘High Quality’ scale based on their overall performance and the league’s elite are marked separately in blue.
- Colored outlines suggest a potential change in class.
- Underlined players will be 30+ years old for the 2014 season.
- Red player names suggest injury risks.
- Click on the image to enlarge.




Roster Notes

- The Rams have one of the least diverse rosters when it comes to talent. This is due to the fact that 18 of 24 players are in the average to below average starter category which is tied for the most in the league. This makes them as a team a largely unknown because nearly every projected starter is someone who hasn’t lived up to their draft pick yet but has the potential to improve.

- By far the best position group is the defensive line. Only three players on the roster are an above average starter or better, and two are their defensive ends Robert Quinn and Chris Long. The two defensive tackles, Michael Brockers and Kendall Langford, are also among the best players on the roster.

- Over the last three years the Rams have spent five early draft picks on receivers, and to this point none have developed into anything more than role players. While we list these three players as the likely starters, until someone steps up we will likely continue to see a five-man rotation.

- One of the most interesting positions to keep an eye on this offseason is the interior offensive line. Most of the Rams’ notable free agents are guards including Shelly Smith and Rodger Saffold who both played well as part-time players last year. Regardless of who is or isn’t brought back, look for St. Louis to spend one or more draft picks on offensive linemen. Of the 10 linemen currently under contact, only one was drafted by the Rams.

- The biggest need is slot cornerback where Cortland Finnegan hasn’t lived up to his reputation. It wasn’t ideal to move safety Rodney McLeod to the slot when Finnegan was hurt and it wouldn’t be surprising if next year’s slot corner isn’t currently on the roster.

2014 Cap Situation

At the moment the Rams have very little money to spend on free agents and draft picks, only having roughly $600,000 of cap room per overthecap.com. A lot of this is due to Sam Bradford, Chris Long, James Laurinaitis and Cortland Finnegan having a combined 2014 cap hit of over $50 million. Luckily with high draft picks and few 2013 players as free agents, they aren’t as bad off as other teams with that little cap space.

Potential Casualties

By far the biggest question is at quarterback, where Sam Bradford is an average player and not playing nearly up to his salary. Cutting him would allow the Rams to draft a quarterback early and use the money gained to build around him. Keeping him would mean not re-signing some of their better free agents and continuing to build around him with the draft.

At cornerback, Finnegan’s contract isn’t the most friendly to be cut as it would lead to a lot of dead money, but with his age and production it would make sense to let him go.

The other two possibilities that would save a few million each are linemen Harvey Dahl and Scott Wells. Both were well-paid free agents who have played decently but not up to expectations. Letting them go would give them cap space to re-sign some of their free agent offensive linemen, and also give them opportunities to be full-time starters. Releasing Finnegan as well as these two linemen would effectively make Chris Long, who is currently 28, the oldest player on the roster.

Opportunities from the Roster

It wasn’t until Week 9 that third-round rookie Stedman Bailey worked his way into the wide receiver rotation. His playing time went up as the season went on to the point where he was playing in 40 or more snaps in each of the last two games. His PFF pass rating of +1.9 was the best out of the Rams’ wide receivers, and he could earn himself a starting job next year.

Cory Harkey mostly lines up at fullback, but at times plays tight end or goes out to play like a wide receiver. His receiving numbers on a small sample size looked very good especially late in the season, so he could gain more receiving opportunities in 2014.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
22,979
Name
mojo
If Sam Bradford is an injury risk then so are Jake Long,Scott Wells and Rodger Saffold.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
22,979
Name
mojo
I really like the idea of charting out a starting roster like this...but this guy needs to do some homework beyond "the DLine is great and the WR's aren't."
 

ReddingRam

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,459
the OP says that cutting Finnegan would lead to huge dead money .... I thought they I have read that his contract is structured to NOT do that. Sure there will be some ... but it would still benefit the salary cap more so if they DID .... wouldn't it?
 

bluecollarram

Starter
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
780
Name
Dave
I really like the idea of charting out a starting roster like this...but this guy needs to do some homework beyond "the DLine is great and the WR's aren't."
I'm guessing he used PFF but I haven't looked yet. His conclusion seems biased as this team is very young.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,268
Name
Burger man

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,268
Name
Burger man
Ya ... I mean that is doable, right? And there wouldn't be much in subsequent yrs? If it is true and we only have around less than $1 mil. coming up .... we will NEED at LEAST $4 mil just to draft?

Anything left owing is all accelerated, thus the dead money. Therefore, no more in subsequent years.

I think with Finnegan, however, there is a roster bonus element which forces a decision in March as opposed to the option to cut in June and spread the dead money over '14 and '15.
 

Boffo97

Still legal in 17 states!
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
5,278
Name
Dave
Anything left owing is all accelerated, thus the dead money. Therefore, no more in subsequent years.

I think with Finnegan, however, there is a roster bonus element which forces a decision in March as opposed to the option to cut in June and spread the dead money over '14 and '15.
Don't they have a mechanism in place now where you can "designate" someone a post June 1st cut while you actually cut them now?

Or would that help in this dilemma?

Because we can't continue to actively pay millions for what we got last year from the guy.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,268
Name
Burger man
Don't they have a mechanism in place now where you can "designate" someone a post June 1st cut while you actually cut them now?

Or would that help in this dilemma?

Because we can't continue to actively pay millions for what we got last year from the guy.

You could be right.

But, the roster bonus in March is on top of the dead money listed. Therefore, the March decision still needs to be made.
 

Ramrasta

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
3,116
Name
Tyler
Is it just me or does this look more like what you would expect the Redskins roster to look like? This appears like we have an utterly below average team with no offensive talent to speak of... :confused:
 

A55VA6

Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
8,208
This is a terrible chart. Just saying. And Austin Pettis and Givens starting over Bailey? Uh.... no.
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,709
Is it just me or does this look more like what you would expect the Redskins roster to look like? This appears like we have an utterly below average team with no offensive talent to speak of... :confused:
For reference:
Lineup-WAS2.png