On paper, this looks like an elite type D, doesn't it?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Fowler's presence and effectiveness might allow them to tighten up their splits inside since they won't have to generate all of their pass rush with Donald and Suh.

So maybe they can protect their LBs better in tbe run game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LARAMSinFeb. and BonifayRam
Rams43 said:
But on the field it’s a far different thing.

I thought that by game 10 the gelling would surely have already occurred. Clearly it hasn’t, has it?

I’ll leave the x’s and o’s to others, but I will say this.

This D is not playing nearly as well as a unit as their talent would indicate. That’s usually a result of faulty coaching. When previously dominating players suddenly are struggling, what else should we conclude?

Wade owns this D and if he has square plugs going into round holes, talented as those square plugs might be, then I’ve gotta lay the blame at his feet.

Fowler has helped.

Talib’s return should be a huge help.

But geez. How in the world do they allow 273 rushing yards to the Seahawks? And give Wilson an easy 90+ rushing yards? Boggles the mind.

I love this team as much as any poster, but that doesn’t mean that I’m gonna ignore the obvious. This currently functioning D is gonna kill us in the playoffs. It’s gonna be the Atlanta fubar all over again unless SOMETHING changes.

The Emperor has no clothes, y’all.
Click to expand...

Expected the punchline title there 43...

Well I feel like our D did better last year compared to this year so far. Our O last year was less electrifying compared to this year.. Still got a lot of gelling. I wouldn’t expect too much. Its ok to benchmark, but its obvious of what is going on...Barely on year 2 and we are almost about to surpass Jeff Fishers win ratio in the 4 years he was in charge.

We are fine, and we will get better wherever the room for improvement is needed...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ewe83 and BonifayRam
I disagree a little on the Dline part. It appears to me that Wade always favored more attacking type Dline instead of the type that just occupies space. I don't think he will ever draft that big bodied NT that a lot of fans want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldSchool
no DT with anchor ass, all rush first. they are very good at rush first, will never be great against run
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotanez
The DL needs to learn to differentiate passing plays and running plays. No point in trying to attack straight for the QB if he is going to hand it off they should close in on the lane and make the tackle... Its good to pressure the QB but its not always about a sack every play...
 
  • Like
Reactions: LARAMSinFeb. and hotanez
SteezyEndo said:
The DL needs to learn to differentiate passing plays and running plays. No point in trying to attack straight for the QB if he is going to hand it off they should close in on the lane and make the tackle... Its good to pressure the QB but its not always about a sack every play...
Click to expand...

A good back will use the lane made by an aggressive pass rush by simply side stepping and shoot the diagonal lane …I call it baby cut back... how many times have we seen it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LARAMSinFeb.
Ramer said:
A good back will use the lane made by an aggressive pass rush by simply side stepping and shoot the diagonal lane …I call it baby cut back... how many times have we seen it?
Click to expand...
Definitely a lot more then I would like. it's been very frustrating watching this defense trying to defend against the run. I know a lot of the failures fall on the players but Wade does deserve a good share too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LARAMSinFeb. and SteezyEndo
SteezyEndo said:
Happen to us? Too damn much, and thats what we need to fix. We need a better gauge for when to be aggressive and not overly aggressive where it becomes predictable...
Click to expand...

Tottaly agree with it... would still like to see a defensive game plan with results. Perhaps utilize the player's potention by
situating players (mainly Donald) uniquely based on down/distance circumstances.. Like it was mentioned earlier..not every play is about a sack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotanez and SteezyEndo
People seem to be overlooking one small detail - we were very solid vs run and pass - early in the season. Something has gone wrong since, but we have the talent, they just need to play a lot better... again
 
  • Like
Reactions: nighttrain
Fans always overvalue their young players, with expectations of all of them working out or even being high end players, but most of them don't reach those lofty levels. Out of all our young LBs only one actually delivered, that being Littleton, and he's not delivering at an elite level yet.

Right now electronic Ramsdom is trying to get their heads around that. But the more appropriate question is out of all the subpar roster spots which is most important?

I actually am starting to feel like a high end safety would have the most impact. Certainly we need an ILB to replace Barron (his cap hit after the season drops to $2M), another edge rusher (two if they don't sign Fowler), NT, and a CB for depth at the least, but a safety who is big and instinctive and can switch it up run/pass might well have the biggest impact of all in this defense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back