What has Bradford showed u to think that because I'm not to sure we would have won more then 2 more games Bradford is still unproven.
Watching him in camp and (briefly) in preseason, watching him before his injury last year, and watching how he's both synced with the WRs on the roster (esp. Quick) and evolved under Schottenheimer's offense.
Plus, look at it this way...
2014 Rams Passing Stats (14 games):
- Yards - 2916
- TDs - 18
- INTs - 13
Sam Bradford's 2013 Passing Stats (6.5 games):
- Yards - 1687
- TDs - 14
- INTs - 4
Project out over 16 games, and you're looking at
Stat -- 2014 QBs -- 2013 Bradford
Yards -- 3332 -- 3856
TDs -- 21 -- 32
INTs -- 15 -- 9
That's a big difference, plus you're looking at a stronger O-line, WR corps and running game to lean on in 2014, which should at least ensure that the good projections of Bradford are well within reason, if not a little conservative. But you're looking at potentially 66 more points (or 33 if you assume that all extra TD drives ended in FGs in 2014).
More importantly, though, look at the turnovers - 66% more interceptions, and if you factor in fumbles, Bradford put 3 on the turf and lost 1 last year, while Hill and Austin have combined for 11 fumbles with 4 lost. Project that out over the season, you're looking at 6 fumbles/2 lost vs. 14/5 lost.
In short, based on his play last year and the play of the Rams QBs this season, Bradford would very likely have scored a non-trivial amount of extra points and turned the ball over significantly fewer times. And frankly, turnovers have been the direct cause of at least a couple of losses, particularly from Hill and Davis.