duanevalle22
Pro Bowler
Can I borrow that to make a gangsta rap mix.... lol... I think we could retire off of it and I'll give you 25% of the publishing
HoF 15 finalists
- Thread starter OldSchool
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
You're calling me sad? For not wanting Vinatieri to get in on the first try over Holt - fucking Torry Holt, for fate's sake - when he's been waiting for more than a decade?
You want to get personal and insult my intelligence and football knowledge, that's your prerogative, but this is a Rams site for Rams homers, and no fucking kicker - let alone a Cheatriots kicker - should ever get in on the first try over an All-Decade receiver who was on our team and has been waiting for far too long.
I apologize if the first priority of this board is Rams Homerism. I was talking in realistic terms but if thats not the true "tenor" of the board then i was wrong to do so.
duanevalle22
Pro Bowler
Why is it so bad to be a homer? Like it's some character flaw.... So what if fans look at football and their teams through a different lens.
duanevalle22
Pro Bowler
And what about Steven Jackson.... The 10,000 yard club.
He was one of the best Rams running back ever if not the leagues. That one pisses me off as well.
I think what happened with some LA Rams fans is they think they are the greatest or only legitimate cerebral Rams fans, and anything that happened in St. Louis doesn't mean much. I clearly remembered all the nonsense from many of the "Bring Back the Rams to LA" Facebook dicks that would just hammer-on and taunt St. Louis Rams fans.... even at the Dome. My dad would get so pissed off at those clowns.
I don't blame fans (and honestly, as a St. Louisan who became a fan in '99, they had every right to move back and be bitter) as much as I do the arbitrarily-limited ruleset of the writers. This is not like baseball, hockey, or basketball where there aren't many deserving candidates. To me, it would be like this: are these players worthy of the Hall based on their own merits? To me, that's more than six who should be there. Include a past candidate, but make it six or seven modern candidates. There are too many excellent players, HOF worthy players, in football as it is.
That S-Jax will never get in the Hall in his lifetime while Gore and Lynch likely will is a travesty of justice. Still, it's not the fault of fans who watched him be the only player worth watching - and the only person able to will them to victory on the rare occasions of wins - on those shitty ass teams. It's the fault of the writers like Peter King who think that he and Holt (and I'll throw in Reggie Wayne; he's long been deserving as well) aren't deserving when they very clearly are.
duanevalle22
Pro Bowler
Be careful.... You're not allowed to make fun of writers around here.
Well I guess we get to look forward to Stafford getting in on first ballot when he's 49 years old, because I guess we want him to stay on the field until he's 43
...... I was actually surprised / impressed the nerdball writers gave Stafford the MVP.
I felt the same way about Vinitairi getting in on his first year of Eligibility,
I do believe he deserves to get in but not in his first year.
I would have been okay with year 5 or later.
True RAMS fans are “RAMS” fans. Not CLE RAMS, LA RAMS, ANAHEIM RAMS, ST LOUIS RAMS fans.
duanevalle22
Pro Bowler
I just don't get where you come up with some of this shit. Seriously. It's baffling. We (collective we) bag on writers and sports talking heads all the time. It's pretty common.Be careful.... You're not allowed to make fun of writers around here.