Greatest Boxers and Their Times

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Best boxers in history

  • Sugar Ray Robinson

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • Joe Lewis

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Muhammad Ali

    Votes: 3 60.0%
  • Roberto Hands of Stone Duran

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Marvelous Marvin Hagler

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • Sugar Ray Leonard

    Votes: 2 40.0%
  • Tommy Hitman Hearns

    Votes: 2 40.0%
  • Iron Mike Tyson

    Votes: 3 60.0%
  • Floyd Mayweather Jr

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • Evander the Warrior Holyfield

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • Many Pacquiao

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • George (I really love the name George) Foreman

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • Smokin’ Joe Frazier

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5
Holyfield was a great fighter. I do remember him being badly rocked by Smokin’ Bert Cooper though. Did well to comeback and win that one.

I saw Pacquiao fight in Vegas in 2008. He was absolutely amazing. Completely dominated his opponent (David Díaz).

Usyk deserves a mention as well, tremendous fighter.
 
Holyfield was a great fighter. I do remember him being badly rocked by Smokin’ Bert Cooper though. Did well to comeback and win that one.
I think I’ve seen Holyfield rocked in almost every fight I’ve seen him in. His defense sucks but he’s got a steel chin and he just keeps coming forward and throwing punches.
 
  • High Five
Reactions: HX76
Holyfield was a great fighter. I do remember him being badly rocked by Smokin’ Bert Cooper though. Did well to comeback and win that one.

I saw Pacquiao fight in Vegas in 2008. He was absolutely amazing. Completely dominated his opponent (David Díaz).

Usyk deserves a mention as well, tremendous fighter.
Usyk is dynamic.
He would have success as a heavy in any era.
 
I love this subject. And I agree with @fearsomefour that MMA has largely taken over but I still way prefer the sweet science of boxing. Even if you’re watching a fight with brawlers like Boom Boom and Sean O’Grady, there was still a technical aspect that is far different than MMA. Don’t get me wrong, I realize there are a lot of nuances to a lot of MMA fights but give me boxing all day long. Unless of course it’s two slobs hugging and throwing the occasional punch. I still enjoy the lighter weights for the most part. But nothing has eclipsed what I feel is the height of boxing - the Leonard, Hearns, Hagler era. And I still feel ole “Hands of Stone” was WAY overrated as he fought like 70 nobodies.

I just wish the heavy weights would get back to being king and have some real stars.

I will disagree that Holyfield was a dirty boxer. He could stand in with the hardest punchers and the quickest hands and would always go toe to toe. If someone fought dirty, he would match them - true. But he was almost always the lighter man in the ring and I think when he jerked a shoulder up it was just more noticeable. If you want to watch possibly the best fight I’ve ever seen, watch the 15 round Holyfield/Qawi fight when Evander was a cruiser weight. What a battle. In the second fight, EH simply overwhelmed Qawi.

My other favorite was Leonard. Maybe another post.
I really enjoyed O'Grady's commentary as well.
I agree with the subtle aspects of boxing.
There are some very good heavy weights now and they are huge....in Europe. That division has almost exclusively shifted to a European division.
Evander in his later years was constantly going into every clinch, or nearly every clinch, leading with his head. He was constantly butting opponents. Some, Im sure, caused by him being a smaller guy. Some pretty clearly intentionally.
I do remember that Qawi fight....it was a relentless battle. Holyfield would never step back, thats for sure. A warrior.
 
  • Cheers
Reactions: RamFan503