So why ignore the inverse? You're calling for 20% of the last 20 SB QB's, while ignoring the other 80%. 90% of SB winners the past 10 years have been pocket passers, Wilson being the only exception, and he isn't like most scrambles. By your own parameters, we have the QB more likely to win us a Super Bowl. Also why is just making the Super Bowl okay? Why isn't winning it what's important? Otherwise what's the difference between going out in the first round (as you have voiced your displeasure about) and being the Super Bowl loser? Either way, you're not going out on top.