Eagles at Bears

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Trubisky should have at least 3 INT’s in the first half. And if the official hadn’t blown his whistle after that completed pass/fumble Chicago would not have 6 points right now. Will this catch up to Chicago in the second half, or are the Bears going to be this years version of Forrest Gump luck merchants.
 
hotanez said:
But if the Bears aren't the 2017 Rams who were those Rams? and who are the Bears? perhaps the Lions of 2006?(n):confused:
Click to expand...
One helluva lot better offense than the sucky 2018 Bears. I know you've heard the stupid comparisons...
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotanez
and I took the over

:rant::palm:
 
Chargers and Colts looked really good. Wouldn’t surprise me at all if one or both win on the road...
 
  • Like
Reactions: T-REX and Ramrocket
In hindsight the ref calling the pass incomplete is understandable. He didn't have the angle.

Now as far as it being a fumble, technically it wasn't because he blew the whistle and called the pass incomplete. So the play is over as he called it and the review angles prove that it was a catch and fumble, but the call on the field was backed by the replay ref.

But that was a legit fumble other than the whistle making it not a fumble.

So. It was a catch and a fumble without factoring in the whistle.

But the call was incomplete pass and the whistle said so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotanez
Exactly. Didn't they used to have some kind of "inadvertent" whistle ruling somewhere before?
"...therefore the previous play is not reviewable."
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotanez
LesBaker said:
In hindsight the ref calling the pass incomplete is understandable. He didn't have the angle.

Now as far as it being a fumble, technically it wasn't because he blew the whistle and called the pass incomplete. So the play is over as he called it and the review angles prove that it was a catch and fumble, but the call on the field was backed by the replay ref.

But that was a legit fumble other than the whistle making it not a fumble.

So. It was a catch and a fumble without factoring in the whistle.

But the call was incomplete pass and the whistle said so.
Click to expand...



:dizzy: :seizure: :dizzy: :seizure: :dizzy: :seizure: :dizzy: :seizure: :dizzy: :seizure: :dizzy::seizure: :dizzy: :seizure:
 
which team has a better chance at beating the Saints? Eagles or Cowboys?
 
Chicago's best QB in the last 10 years
gWvDFg9.png
 
These defenseless receiver penalties have gotten out of hand. What are you supposed to do just let the guy make a catch and hope somebody tackles him?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mojo Ram
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back