Am i jerk because...

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4
the main reason I don't want to see 50 shades of grey is because the woman is unattractive? I mean, I've watched movies with awful plots before for the nudity. But this one seems uninteresting because frankly there are many prettier woman out there naked.

I say this with full acknowledgement that I myself am no prize, and will now end the shallow rant. If there are any ladies on ROD, well thank god for internet anonymity.
 

LazyWinker

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
1,662
Name
Paul
How dare you think Don Johnson's daughter is unattractive!!!

She does look like she's on the wrong side of 40 which is impressive considering that she's 25.
 

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3
How dare you think Don Johnson's daughter is unattractive!!!

She does look like she's on the wrong side of 40 which is impressive considering that she's 25.

That's Don Johnson's daughter?

That means I'm old.
 

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #4
You know, women judge people by their looks just as much as men do. And they get away with it. So I don't give a shit if I'm shallow. I'm not going to see that movie dammit.
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
THAT'S your main reason for not wanting to see it? For shame, bruh. Fo shame.

That horse shit written drivel marketed to 40 year old house wives who have no husbands that know how to please a woman is absolutely hilarious.

You do know it started as Twilight fanfiction....right? :LOL::ROFLMAO::sick::eek:

And apparently, this more than slightly overweight author according to the BDSM community, doesn't know two shits about the BDSM culture. (Not that I do either. That's some weird shit I have no interest in.)

And apparently, the script writer had to overhaul the author's trash prose as well that bordered on being worse than a 15 year old's ranting writing about sex and fucking the hot millionaire dude named "insert stupid name here."

The entire tale, just like twilight, seems oddly misogynistic and about putting women in the kitchen to be a slave. For sex or otherwise. Or totally dependent on the male.

As an aside, I went with my friends at MU to see the on-campus screening of that Twilight movie. My god. My roommate and I were laughing our asses off five minutes into it and kept getting dirty looks by all the gals in attendance. I feel dirty that an actual human being wrote that shit.

Anyway, it's just sad that cow dung authors like that can sell out for millions selling shit to hormonal middle schoolers and cloistered suburban housewives and truly talented authors often never see the light of day or enough money to really make any decent sort of living.

Such is capitalism and the breadth of stupidity in America.

That rant over.......

As for the title actress for the title role....

kristen-dakota-met-06may14-02.jpg


She is pretty meh though. Looks like she's survived on a diet of cigarettes and salad the last five years and yea....you're right about looking closer to 40 than, yesh, 25? o_Oo_O


At the end of the day, you'd find a hotter girl and better acting/writing in your average Euro-style porn. Heck, probably even American too than wasting time and money watching this.
 

bluecoconuts

Legend
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
13,073
From what I heard a lot of people turned down roles for the movie, so they had to scrape at the bottom of the barrel. I won't see it, my girlfriend doesn't want to either, she thinks the book sounds stupid.
 

ChrisW

Stating the obvious
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
4,670
the main reason I don't want to see 50 shades of grey is because the woman is unattractive? I mean, I've watched movies with awful plots before for the nudity. But this one seems uninteresting because frankly there are many prettier woman out there naked.

I say this with full acknowledgement that I myself am no prize, and will now end the shallow rant. If there are any ladies on ROD, well thank god for internet anonymity.

Take the Gandalf stance, my friend.

39525a0533e355075686e2a65dcce511.jpg
 

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9
THAT'S your main reason for not wanting to see it? For shame, bruh. Fo shame.

That horse crap written drivel marketed to 40 year old house wives who have no husbands that know how to please a woman is absolutely hilarious.

You do know it started as Twilight fanfiction....right? :LOL::ROFLMAO::sick::eek:

And apparently, this more than slightly overweight author according to the BDSM community, doesn't know two shits about the BDSM culture. (Not that I do either. That's some weird crap I have no interest in.)

And apparently, the script writer had to overhaul the author's trash prose as well that bordered on being worse than a 15 year old's ranting writing about sex and freaking the hot millionaire dude named "insert stupid name here."

The entire tale, just like twilight, seems oddly misogynistic and about putting women in the kitchen to be a slave. For sex or otherwise. Or totally dependent on the male.

As an aside, I went with my friends at MU to see the on-campus screening of that Twilight movie. My god. My roommate and I were laughing our asses off five minutes into it and kept getting dirty looks by all the gals in attendance. I feel dirty that an actual human being wrote that crap.

Anyway, it's just sad that cow dung authors like that can sell out for millions selling crap to hormonal middle schoolers and cloistered suburban housewives and truly talented authors often never see the light of day or enough money to really make any decent sort of living.

Such is capitalism and the breadth of stupidity in America.

That rant over.......

As for the title actress for the title role....

kristen-dakota-met-06may14-02.jpg


She is pretty meh though. Looks like she's survived on a diet of cigarettes and salad the last five years and yea....you're right about looking closer to 40 than, yesh, 25? o_Oo_O


At the end of the day, you'd find a hotter girl and better acting/writing in your average Euro-style porn. Heck, probably even American too than wasting time and money watching this.

I agree with you, but come on man. Like you've never watched a horrible movie for a hot naked actress.

I could ignore all that about capitalism if she was Salma Hayak.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,941
Name
Stu
She's Don Johnson AND Melanie Griffith's daughter and I guess it's not popular thought here but I think she's not half bad. And to quote Ron White, "Once you've seen one pair of titties, you pretty much wanna see the rest of 'em."

All that aside, I saw some clips of the movie and it looks freaking unwatchable. It strikes me as something that is trying way too hard to be edgy. I'm thinking Red Shoe Diaries with a huge budget and even worse acting. Or a really bad attempt to be the next Eyes Wide Shut. Look for this turkey to be nominated for a golden raspberry.
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
I could ignore all that about capitalism if she was Salma Hayak.

lmao. I still wouldn't pay to see that shit. It'd have to be on someone else's dime and they'd have to wake me up every time a Salma nuddie scene popped up.

She's Don Johnson AND Melanie Griffith's daughter and I guess it's not popular thought here but I think she's not half bad. And to quote Ron White, "Once you've seen one pair of titties, you pretty much wanna see the rest of 'em."

Agreed on the titties. She's kinda plain and that face just looks way older than it should for 25. I still see more smokin regular gals every day at the gym. It's really amazing. I'd consider your girl next door to be far more attractive than the most glitzed up movie stars actually.

All that aside, I saw some clips of the movie and it looks freaking unwatchable. It strikes me as something that is trying way too hard to be edgy. I'm thinking Red Shoe Diaries with a huge budget and even worse acting. Or a really bad attempt to be the next Eyes Wide Shut. Look for this turkey to be nominated for a golden raspberry.

I watched a trailer for morbid curiosity and the acting looked worse than the worst soap opera.
 

HeiseNBerg

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
1,301
I won't go out of my way to see this, but if Mrs. HNB suggests it (once it's on video, of course) then I won't object.

This kind of movie was already made, back in 2002: Secretary, with Maggie Gyllenhaal and James Spader.

Though I have no doubt that 50 Shades will be a greater commercial success, I'm betting that Secretary is the better movie.
 

Dodgersrf

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
10,794
Name
Scott
No interest whatsoever.

I did enjoy 9 1/2 weeks. But that was 25 years ago, and Mikey Rourke is a hell of a good actor.
Kim Basinger was also nice to look at.
 

Angry Ram

Captain RAmerica Original Rammer
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
17,900
Any woman that wants to see it should never throw a bitch fit when her boyfriend/husband looks at naked chicks.

That movie looks boring anyway. I can imagine better fantasies.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
I'll probably just jerk off to the book.
 

Sum1

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
3,604
She kind of looks like one of those women that as far as celebrity standards go, she isn't that hot...if she was a random woman you met out, you'd probably find her more attractive.
 

LazyWinker

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
1,662
Name
Paul
@Athos
I too also watched Twilight... only because I had too much to drink and my captives didn't want me drinking and driving. All I remember is the baseball scene. Something about that windup is memorable.

She kind of looks like one of those women that as far as celebrity standards go, she isn't that hot...if she was a random woman you met out, you'd probably find her more attractive.
I live in rural Kentucky... After awhile all women are attractive... but to be fair, Ashley Judd live here once.
 

blue4

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
3,126
Name
blue4
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #19
lmao. I still wouldn't pay to see that crap. It'd have to be on someone else's dime and they'd have to wake me up every time a Salma nuddie scene popped up.



Agreed on the titties. She's kinda plain and that face just looks way older than it should for 25. I still see more smokin regular gals every day at the gym. It's really amazing. I'd consider your girl next door to be far more attractive than the most glitzed up movie stars actually.



I watched a trailer for morbid curiosity and the acting looked worse than the worst soap opera.


I fast forwarded thru the entire Freda movie only stopping at Salma's good bits. It was time well spent.
 

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
17,354
Name
Jemma
I couldn't agree more with Athos. Twilight and 50 Shades of Gray treat women worse than shit, and that's the main reason why I hate both of them. I know at least fifty people on one site alone that have more writing talent in their pinky than those two have in their entire bodies. And the sad thing is that none of them even dream of making it big; they just write because they love to write. But my fucking fate, I absolutely know that they're better than most of the big names that are currently in the business.