OFFICIAL 2026 NFL Draft Stuff

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Wouldn't mind the Rams trading back 4 or 5 spots from 13 and trading up about 15 spots from 61.

Get two picks in that 20-45 range, who both could be contributing players this year. And still have one remaining 3rd rd pick (from your pick 13 trade back) to grab maybe your swing OT, or trade back from that pick to get a 4th & a 5th. Then fill out OL & DL depth.
I think that’s what most of us would like at this point. Once again, the Rams have done a masterful job in the offseason and made the upcoming draft potentially icing on the cake.
 
After the initial wave of free agency a lot of mocks have us taking Sadiq, but I just don't see it. With Ferguson we already have a young TE and Higbee is back.
Wouldn’t it nullify the Ferguson pick? Just how many plays are you gonna dedicate to making the TE the primary option?

I don’t want a TE early.
 
Who's going to trade up though in this allegedly weak ass draft? Pauline is talking out of his ass making stuff up.
All it takes is one team. I believe it is a weak draft and there around 14 to 16 first round grades. So the Rams not desperate for anything are in a position where there should be a first round talent at 13 to make a move if a deal looks too good to pass up.
 
Not exactly. Teams will still want their guys. You'll just have to accept less compensation than you would in stronger years.
of course teams still want certain players, I mean they need to draft somebody right? If said players aren't worth trading up for what's the point. I don't believe that to be true but it can make it harder to trade back and accumulate draft picks.
 
of course teams still want certain players, I mean they need to draft somebody right? If said players aren't worth trading up for what's the point. I don't believe that to be true but it can make it harder to trade back and accumulate draft picks.
That's not how they look at it. The compensation goes down, but there will still be teams trading up. 2013 is a perfect example. Weak draft at the top, but there were still a lot of first round trades. The weakness resulted in the teams trading down having to settle for substantially less compensation than they would in other years. For example, Miami traded #12 and #42 to Oakland for pick #3. According to the TVC, pick #3 has a value of 2200. #12 and #42 have a combined value of 1680.
 
  • Cheers
Reactions: WestCoastRam
That's not how they look at it. The compensation goes down, but there will still be teams trading up. 2013 is a perfect example. Weak draft at the top, but there were still a lot of first round trades. The weakness resulted in the teams trading down having to settle for substantially less compensation than they would in other years. For example, Miami traded #12 and #42 to Oakland for pick #3. According to the TVC, pick #3 has a value of 2200. #12 and #42 have a combined value of 1680.
Can’t go back that far. Things have changed in the last 13 years with how scouts value positions, players evaluated and rookie wages. Which draft chart are you referring to?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotanez
Who's going to trade up though in this allegedly weak ass draft? Pauline is talking out of his ass making stuff up.
I love how they contradict themselves.
So this draft sucks and next year looks great. So some team is going to trade great draft assets to move up in a weak class.
Got it
 
  • High Five
Reactions: hotanez
Can’t go back that far. Things have changed in the last 13 years with how scouts value positions, players evaluated and rookie wages. Which draft chart are you referring to?
I can go back that far. The rookie wage scale went into effect in 2011. Any changes to positional value aren't important when we're talking about pick values. And I used the traditional draft value chart---the one that was in use in 2013.

Even in weak drafts, teams will trade up for players they're targeting. If anything, there's greater incentive to do so. Where the draft's weakness hits you is in the compensation you can command.
 
I love how they contradict themselves.
So this draft sucks and next year looks great. So some team is going to trade great draft assets to move up in a weak class.
Got it
Yeah, that's the thing. It's unlikely teams will trade premium picks in 2027 to move up this year. That's the downside of a weak draft. But teams will look to move up.