OFFICIAL 2026 NFL Draft Stuff

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Lawrence wanted his contract re-done for more than a year.

At last year's training camp, several members of the local media referenced that he appeared out-of-shape.

His play reflected the above; and may have been a factor in the Giants not wanting to pay him top-DL-$.
That's definitely a bad sign that he wasn't in shape. Aw well not our problem hahaha
 

It's funny watching that vid, how those guys know about as much as we do which is jack shit.

However all that aside I would bet that the perennial pro bowl players from the top of the order will be Love and Styles.

Love's got so much quality in his game that unless he's completely misused he's a safe bet to be felt from day one for whoever takes him.

And Styles is more than a big freak athlete playing the position. He's not just a chase backer, as he routinely on film stacks and sheds linemen to make plays, so as he matures into his prime of his playing years someone's going to get one excellent stud to anchor the middle of their defense.

Honestly Styles is the one player who I'd move up for in this draft, given that I've seen him go outside the very top group. Because the Rams need a target to slide into that 8 range ish in order to move up as they're not going to surrender their 2027 first rounder. It isn't likely Styles gets that low of course. In fact I'd say there's no chance, but you never know with a draft.
 
So to get this straight. They just gave up the 9th pick in the draft for a guy who seems to be gaining weight and showing declining skills and will be 29 years old next season? And he wants a larger multi-year contract. OK.

The 10th pick ... not 9th.

Lawrence has always been Humongous (in the 340-350 range), so I don't know if he was gaining weight, or was simply not in as good of shape. Just several local sports media types (example would be Boomer Esiason) noted that he did not appear to be in top-shape in the Giants' 2025 Training Camp.

As far as declining skills, I also don't know. Lawrence was dominant from 2022-2024.

Most of what I noted was merely speculation from local New York media, including reporters that cover the Giants daily from training camp through the season (Jordan Raanan is another example ... has been on ESPN).

Lawrence's desire to be paid top-DL-$ has been reported for over a year. Hs recent trade request was new.
 
And they probably won't have any trouble resigning him.
I think as the season wears on they're going to find that Dexter Lawrence is "resigned"....and weary.
I can only guess that this is Cincinnati's way of going all in and they think a declining nose tackle can pick up enough steam towards the end of his career to get them there.
 
So to get this straight. They just gave up the 9th pick in the draft for a guy who seems to be gaining weight and showing declining skills and will be 29 years old next season? And he wants a larger multi-year contract.
OK.View attachment 75376
Yeah... this was a beyond stupid trade for the Bengals. I understand if they didn't like their options at 10 and a motivated Lawrence is probably far, far better than any DT in this draft but this trade makes zero sense for a player entering the last phase of his career on the apparent decline who wants a new contract. They almost certainly could've gotten a good young player on a rookie contract, but whatever. Keep wasting Burrow's career, we'll take him off your hands when he pulls a Stafford and gets tired of carrying a losing franchise.
 
It's funny watching that vid, how those guys know about as much as we do which is jack shit.

However all that aside I would bet that the perennial pro bowl players from the top of the order will be Love and Styles.

Love's got so much quality in his game that unless he's completely misused he's a safe bet to be felt from day one for whoever takes him.

And Styles is more than a big freak athlete playing the position. He's not just a chase backer, as he routinely on film stacks and sheds linemen to make plays, so as he matures into his prime of his playing years someone's going to get one excellent stud to anchor the middle of their defense.

Honestly Styles is the one player who I'd move up for in this draft, given that I've seen him go outside the very top group. Because the Rams need a target to slide into that 8 range ish in order to move up as they're not going to surrender their 2027 first rounder. It isn't likely Styles gets that low of course. In fact I'd say there's no chance, but you never know with a draft.
Jerry trading up for a RB and ignoring his D is a very real possibility when you look at the stupid moves he's made.
 

View: https://x.com/PFSN365/status/2045541371633664276


Didn't know they had an interest in Antonio Williams. Productive and plays special teams.

Dude's face looks like he just did up an eight ball in the locker room.

Mike is smart and plugged in. Says he thinks there will be a lot of trades especially between 10 and 15 where the talent drops
God I hope so. I'd love to see Trader Les move us down where we can get value with the pick that fits.

It's interesting that the "skilled, smart football player" whose dad has been a QB coach and/or Offensive Coordinator in the Pros and College for about 25 years doesn't have a better stat line than the "unpolished physical talent." Different competition but interesting nonetheless.

Garett Nussmeier's college stat line
660 completions from 1032 attempts for 64% completion percentage, 7,699 yards, 52TDs vs. 24 INTs

70 carries for -153 yards and 5 TDs

Drew Allar's college stat line
633 completions from 1,002 attempts for 64.8% completion percentage, 7,402 yards, 61 TDs vs. 13 INTs

224 carries for 736 yards and 12 TDs
That's really interesting. And yet I still don't like Allar. No matter how I slice it I just can't get past the fact he still has shit mechanics. If he had that drive you want he almost surely would have shown some improvement with his feet.

He'll go before the other QB2 types and projects that litter this year's field. Hope we don't take him, but if we do it means McVay feels he's got the desire and faculties upstairs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTackle
Yep, it looks more and more like OL or Defense. I will be rooting for D. This offense wares down a D and if our D can be the take away machine it is shaping up to be, our offense is going to look a more explosive. A lot less 90 yard drives. So if I can't have Love, let's go impact D. But no short CBs
I would love a defensive draft. Slide down to add another pick, add a big ass snot bubblin NT and an ILB, and still have room to add an OL and WR.

Target range in this draft is the early middle I think. Where you get best value for your selections in this class.
 
  • High Five
Reactions: BonifayRam
As it pertains to the late rounds I have two hopes:

1. That we find a returner for special teams. This is so overdue it's ridiculous.

2. That if we have not taken a QB we take Pavia. He has no chance to start at this level between his size and iffy arm, but I'd love to see that competitive little fucker in preseason. And he'd probably give the offense a shot in the arm coming off the bench, not to mention he's capable of spelling a running QB for the scout team.
 
Yeah... this was a beyond stupid trade for the Bengals. I understand if they didn't like their options at 10 and a motivated Lawrence is probably far, far better than any DT in this draft but this trade makes zero sense for a player entering the last phase of his career on the apparent decline who wants a new contract. They almost certainly could've gotten a good young player on a rookie contract, but whatever. Keep wasting Burrow's career, we'll take him off your hands when he pulls a Stafford and gets tired of carrying a losing franchise.
I agree. I'd be PISSED if the Rams made this trade personally. If you are desperate for a DT that has some pass rush juice (which he did not last year) trade down and grab a guy like Faulk (IMO can play DT), McDonald, P. Woods, or a personal crush Miller. I'd much rather trade way back, acquire more premium picks and take my shot on Woods then trade for and PAY (28m extension) an older DT who did not produce in the most recent season.
 
  • Cheers
Reactions: Ramstien
I agree. I'd be PISSED if the Rams made this trade personally. If you are desperate for a DT that has some pass rush juice (which he did not last year) trade down and grab a guy like Faulk (IMO can play DT), McDonald, P. Woods, or a personal crush Miller. I'd much rather trade way back, acquire more premium picks and take my shot on Woods then trade for and PAY (28m extension) an older DT who did not produce in the most recent season.
FWIW, it's considered a pretty terrible draft for DT. I think the consensus are that all those guys are pretty mid. Faulk playing inside I can't comment on though since I havent' watched him at all.
 
Duffie is also 3 years younger (25 vs 28).

The difference between pick 29 and 10 is the equivalence of pick 28. The 3 extra picks the rams gave up is the equivalence of an early/mid (7-20) 3rd rounder. Added up, maybe the 20th pick in first round. So Rams gave up th value of the 20th pick for Duffie. Versus 10 for Dexter.
All of that may be true, but if each player delivers, then both teams should be happy.

I was looking more at the implications that maybe this draft isn’t all that.

Possibly, cincy has adopted the Rams’ way of thinking and making damn sure they get someone talented and capable of having an instant effect for the 1rst round pick.

I was also looking at the g-men and THEIR angle. They have a new HC and two picks inside the top 10 could be a great way to jump start the new regime. They can grab a day 1 starter on both sides of the ball. If they both hit…
 
As it pertains to the late rounds I have two hopes:

1. That we find a returner for special teams. This is so overdue it's ridiculous.

2. That if we have not taken a QB we take Pavia. He has no chance to start at this level between his size and iffy arm, but I'd love to see that competitive little fucker in preseason. And he'd probably give the offense a shot in the arm coming off the bench, not to mention he's capable of spelling a running QB for the scout team.
Barion Brown ain’t much at WR but I could see him becoming famous as a return specialist based on how many TDs he scored at the college level
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flatlyner
FWIW, it's considered a pretty terrible draft for DT. I think the consensus are that all those guys are pretty mid. Faulk playing inside I can't comment on though since I havent' watched him at all.
Well Lawrence was mid last year also. Doubt he gets better with age. Faulk has a very high ceiling and is a hell of a lot cheaper. I would bet that he is a least in the range of as good as Lawrence in 2025 as a rookie. Really just hate the trade for the Bengals (and us).
 
It's interesting that the "skilled, smart football player" whose dad has been a QB coach and/or Offensive Coordinator in the Pros and College for about 25 years doesn't have a better stat line than the "unpolished physical talent." Different competition but interesting nonetheless.

Garett Nussmeier's college stat line
660 completions from 1032 attempts for 64% completion percentage, 7,699 yards, 52TDs vs. 24 INTs

70 carries for -153 yards and 5 TDs

Drew Allar's college stat line
633 completions from 1,002 attempts for 64.8% completion percentage, 7,402 yards, 61 TDs vs. 13 INTs

224 carries for 736 yards and 12 TDs
Is it? Memphis, something tells me that you don't even believe in the argument you're making here, that statistics are a good way of judging how polished or skilled a NFL QB prospect is. Let me be clear, Nussmeier has his warts too. That's why at best, we're talking about him as an end of Day 2 prospect. But is he more polished than Allar? Absolutely. Sees the field and reads defenses much better.

But since you've gone the statistics route, here are some other QBs:
Brock Purdy
993/1467
67.7%
12,170 yards
8.3 YPA
81 TDs
33 Ints
151.1 Passer Rating
1177 rushing yards
19 rushing TDs

Justin Fields
423/618
68.4%
5701 yards
9.2 YPA
67 TDs
9 Ints
178.8 Passer Rating
1133 rushing yards
19 rushing TDs

Sam Howell
713/1117
63.8%
10,283 yards
9.2 YPA
92 TDs
23 Ints
164.2 Passer Rating
1009 rushing yards
17 rushing TDs

Hendon Hooker
632/944
66.9%
8974 yards
9.5 YPA
80 TDs
12 Ints
172.2 Passer Rating
2079 rushing yards
25 rushing TDs

Which one of these guys was the most polished and skilled?

And let's compare Drew Allar to another Penn State QB prospect:
Drew Allar
633/1002
63.2%
7402 yards
7.4 YPA
61 TDs
13 Ints
142.7 Passer Rating
736 rushing yards
12 rushing TDs

Trace McSorley
720/1215
59.3%
9899 yards
8.1 YPA
77 TDs
25 Ints
144.5 Passer Rating
1697 rushing yards
30 rushing TDs

What do all these numbers tell us, Memphis? I mean, Trace McSorley was an absolutely terrible QB, yet he put up respectable numbers at Penn State. Hmm...
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTackle
As it pertains to the late rounds I have two hopes:

1. That we find a returner for special teams. This is so overdue it's ridiculous.

2. That if we have not taken a QB we take Pavia. He has no chance to start at this level between his size and iffy arm, but I'd love to see that competitive little fucker in preseason. And he'd probably give the offense a shot in the arm coming off the bench, not to mention he's capable of spelling a running QB for the scout team.
There's the white boy from Iowa that could be had late as a kick returner. He's a fast lil spunky bastid, I'd take a late round flyer on him.



View: https://youtu.be/Pe-8ZgoV_Mw?si=B5gcVwwfqJ70wbAT
 
Well Lawrence was mid last year also. Doubt he gets better with age. Faulk has a very high ceiling and is a hell of a lot cheaper. I would bet that he is a least in the range of as good as Lawrence in 2025 as a rookie. Really just hate the trade for the Bengals (and us).

View: https://x.com/BenjaminSolak/status/2045666817645937081


Yeah, I may be wrong, we'll see. Again, I like the player, like the move for Bengals - if they had just gotten something back - I think it would have been a very good savvy move. Right now, overpay but directionally the right move.

Again, can't comment on Faulk, thought he was and end and not DT. Lawrence can do things from NT (not just the other DT alignments) that many guys can't - part of the reason you get him.