Watkins had me fooled

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Memoriesdk

UDFA
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
41
Name
Memoriesdk
I was ecstatic when we got him and thought he would be a difference maker. But he's been meh with the Chiefs and Cooks has shown what a stud wide receiver could do in this system. Watkins was evidently not one.

So far with the Chiefs he only has 176 receiving yards and a touchdown.
 

HellRam

Starter
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
675
He has around 50-60 rushing yards as well. And he did not play the last game pretty much, a series or two. When he's on the field he's been apart of their offense.

The big misconception about Watkins is that he is a deep threat WR. Irconicaly thats the part of his game that is most lacking. Watkins is more of a possession WR with top end speed and agility. Even in college Sammy's bread and butter was the short game. In Reid's offense, they way they are using him( backfield, slot, they move him around). He's going to produce quality numbers. The Chiefs offense is too stacked for him to put up monster numbers IMO. In McVay's offense there really wasn't a roll Watkins could excell at. Cooks fits what we needed. A true downfield threat and more.

Watkins isn't elite and probabaly never will be. But he's a better football player then what he showed with the Rams last year
 

yrba1

Mild-mannered Rams fan
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
5,117
Dodged a bullet for sure when we offered him a new contract and he declined. Cooks is gonna look like a bargain deal if he can maintain his production throughout his contract.
 

RamDino

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 22, 2014
Messages
3,043
Cooks is way better than Watkins, and time will prove that the Rams made a couple of great decisions.
 

Ramlock

Here we f’n go, baby!
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
5,097
Name
Ramlock
He has around 50-60 rushing yards as well. And he did not play the last game pretty much, a series or two. When he's on the field he's been apart of their offense.

The big misconception about Watkins is that he is a deep threat WR. Irconicaly thats the part of his game that is most lacking. Watkins is more of a possession WR with top end speed and agility. Even in college Sammy's bread and butter was the short game. In Reid's offense, they way they are using him( backfield, slot, they move him around). He's going to produce quality numbers. The Chiefs offense is too stacked for him to put up monster numbers IMO. In McVay's offense there really wasn't a roll Watkins could excell at. Cooks fits what we needed. A true downfield threat and more.

Watkins isn't elite and probabaly never will be. But he's a better football player then what he showed with the Rams last year

He fits that Air Raid they're running ...and times running out!
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
25,121
I was ecstatic when we got him and thought he would be a difference maker. But he's been meh with the Chiefs and Cooks has shown what a stud wide receiver could do in this system. Watkins was evidently not one.

So far with the Chiefs he only has 176 receiving yards and a touchdown.


And the media still thinks he is putting up stats like he did in Clemson. Watkins gets far to much respect for his college feats. He is Tavon 2.0, only a little better.
 

96GS#007

Pro Bowler
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
1,367
One thing he had....and Cooks certainly has as well....are really strong hands. The slants into the end zone with SW were money in the bank.

His downfall was, IMO, a lack of trust. He'd seemingly take plays off or cut off his routes. Really hard to be an integral part of the offense when that occurs.
 

HE WITH HORNS

Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
4,325
In all fairness to Watkins, he got traded into the season last year, and might be a little slow mentally. That wouldn't have been enough time to learn the system and have an impact,. Physically he's great though.
 

MachS

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
3,840
Deandre Hopkins became the receiver we all thought Sammy would become. Cooks a much better pro and an amazing job by our front office to get aggressive and go get him.
 

Adi

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 19, 2016
Messages
1,808
Name
Adi
Hes a rare talent but he is not a superstar because of the inconsistency. If Mcvay cant change his ways , idk if anyone can
 

jacktheripper85

Starter
Joined
Oct 10, 2016
Messages
968
In all fairness to Watkins, he got traded into the season last year, and might be a little slow mentally. That wouldn't have been enough time to learn the system and have an impact,. Physically he's great though.

By the time it would have taken Watkins to learn McVays system we would all be watching football games being played on Mars.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
30,677
Cooks is a much better WR. It's not even close. We're seeing what a #1 WR can do in this offense.
 

MrRiceGuyRJ

Let's Make the Rams Great Again
Joined
Apr 28, 2017
Messages
514
Name
RJ
I was definitely a massive Watkins supporter. And I did definitely like him. But I guess I have to trust McSnead because they got the player that fit their system and it has definitely showed. I'm incredibly happy with how Cooks has panned out thus far
 

Soul Surfer

Legend
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
7,302
Name
Charles Mazyck
In all fairness to Watkins, he got traded into the season last year, and might be a little slow mentally. That wouldn't have been enough time to learn the system and have an impact,. Physically he's great though.
9 touchdowns is not too shabby and Watkins dominated that first San Francisco game.

But yeah, I'll definitely take Cooks over Watkins.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
36,554
Name
Stu
Watkins is more of a possession WR with top end speed and agility. Even in college Sammy's bread and butter was the short game. In Reid's offense, they way they are using him( backfield, slot, they move him around). He's going to produce quality numbers. The Chiefs offense is too stacked for him to put up monster numbers IMO. In McVay's offense there really wasn't a roll Watkins could excell at. Cooks fits what we needed. A true downfield threat and more.
Though Cooks isn’t exactly what you’d think of as a possession receiver, he kinda is. Most of his receptions in college and in the pros have come on shorter routes than many think. Even last year with over 1100 yards, only a couple hundred came on passes over 20 yards. That leaves a lot of passes caught in that short to intermediate distance. You definitely have to respect Cooks ability to go deep but he sets defenders up with the full route tree. And if you play him tight and miss on the tackle, watch out.
 

Ram65

Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Messages
9,938
I thought the Rams could get more out of Sammy. Water under the bridge for the Rams. He was doing good for the Chiefs before getting hurt. Cooks is the Rams man. Waldron was just saying that all three starting WRs can pretty much do the same things. That allows the Rams to move them all around and create mismatches. Cooks is a perfect fit for the Rams offense.
 

LARAMSinFeb.

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
4,854
I was a big Watkins fan last year--I think he was a bigger part of our success than he got credit for. But of course now I'm ALL in on the Cooks train. While I thought we needed that different type of option SW provided us, the coaches are saying the interchangeability of the 3 identical style players we have now is a strength, and yeah I can see how that's the case.
 

HellRam

Starter
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
675
Though Cooks isn’t exactly what you’d think of as a possession receiver, he kinda is. Most of his receptions in college and in the pros have come on shorter routes than many think. Even last year with over 1100 yards, only a couple hundred came on passes over 20 yards. That leaves a lot of passes caught in that short to intermediate distance. You definitely have to respect Cooks ability to go deep but he sets defenders up with the full route tree. And if you play him tight and miss on the tackle, watch out.

No doubt. Cooks is a much more rounded WR, from routes to timing. I won't lie I use to be a big Watkins fan (till that playoff game). However, I think Sammy will work for what KC is doing and Cooks the same for us.

No debate Cooks is the better player.
 

Akrasian

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,960
I was a big Watkins fan last year--I think he was a bigger part of our success than he got credit for. But of course now I'm ALL in on the Cooks train. While I thought we needed that different type of option SW provided us, the coaches are saying the interchangeability of the 3 identical style players we have now is a strength, and yeah I can see how that's the case.

Yes, it's pretty nice when the guy who is supposed to be a possession type slot receiver turns out to be a serious deep threat. Means there are 3 guys they secondary always needs to worry about going for a long TD - so there is no way to adequately guard any of them. Let Higbee continue blocking well while improving as a receiver, and with Gurley, there will be no team in the league that can defend all the targets consistently.