Trey Watts

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
PaRam24

PaRam24

UDFA
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
82
ROD Credit 2025
0
After his performance tonight and with Pead going down, is Watts a lock to make the team? He looked awful jumpy on some runs, but also showed good vision and the ability to find the opening. Also showed some explosiveness, and could possibly contribute on special teams. With our stacked backfield though is there a spot for him?
 
PaRam24 said:
After his performance tonight and with Pead going down, is Watts a lock to make the team? He looked awful jumpy on some runs, but also showed good vision and the ability to find the opening. Also showed some explosiveness, and could possibly contribute on special teams. With our stacked backfield though is there a spot for him?
Click to expand...
nope. Trade bait at best
 
5 rbs seems excessive to me but I also am not used to having the Rams be in a spot to get best player available in the draft either. Watts would seem more of a longshot as far as spots go. Does anyone know if he contributes on s/t?
 
With Bradford possibly missing a few starts, the Rams may be more likely to begin the season with 3 QBs. There goes Peads roster spot. Seems unlikely Watts will make the 53. Probably makes the PS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dodgersrf
Better question is would Watts make it through waivers? I like his vision on the field as it seems like he makes good decision in traffic.
 
Chance you may have to take. Keeping Watts may mean cutting Reid, Sam, Westbrooks, Pettis, Givens etc. Hard decisions.
 
Slappy967 said:
Better question is would Watts make it through waivers? I like his vision on the field as it seems like he makes good decision in traffic.
Click to expand...

After tonight's game I'm not sure he makes it to the PS. It's a nice problem to have though.
 
Why wouldn't one cut Reynolds? Just asking.
 
Dagonet said:
Why wouldn't one cut Reynolds? Just asking.
Click to expand...

ST ace, and doubt 4th RB sees much action behind the starting 3 on drives. I say this even though I like Watts a lot. Really hope he makes the roster somehow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slappy967
Slappy967 said:
Reynolds is an active contributor on special teams and our staff likes that.
Click to expand...

So was Pead. Pead and Watts pretty much the same size. I think Watts could play ST. Watts also brings more to the table than Reynolds.
 
Tron said:
ST ace, and doubt 4th RB sees much action behind the starting 3 on drives. I say this even though I like Watts a lot. Really hope he makes the roster somehow.
Click to expand...

Pead was very active on ST too. Him and Watts close to same size and just as quick. Watts has more upside than Reynolds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mojo Ram
Yea but Pead and Reynolds didnt do the same things on special teams as Pead was a return man.
 
Dagonet said:
Pead was very active on ST too. Him and Watts close to same size and just as quick. Watts has more upside than Reynolds.
Click to expand...

Yea,pead was a ST ace, like reynolds, and both didnt get much snaps on offense. Watts has more upside i agree he already is a better back , but ST will be key for a 4th rb.
 
I think Reynolds gives you experience, hustle and tackling ability. Pead will be replaced by Givens or Greg Reid on kick returns. Unless they decide to kill Austin Pettis by putting him back there again :)
 
Yeah. These are problems were not use to having.
I'm curious to see how this plays out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jjab360
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back