Osweiler

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Mikey Ram

Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
3,398
Name
Mike
How does he turn down $45 million over 3 years...Can he really believe that with his limited body of work he'll get more than that ??? I think he's out of his mind...I would be even more worried about the team that will pay him more than that..The guy hasn't done jack manure yet that tells me he's over a $15 million a year guy...
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...rock-osweiler-scuffle-emerges-at-tmz/#content

Video featuring Brock Osweiler scuffle emerges at TMZ
Posted by Mike Florio on March 7, 2016


As Broncos quarterback Brock Osweiler commences the process of negotiating, through agent Jimmy Sexton, with other teams perhaps interested in paying him more than the Broncos are offering, TMZ has posted a video of a Saturday scuffle outside of a Scottsdale, Arizona pizza shop.

The video begins with a woman pointing to Osweiler and saying, “He’s right here. Say it to his face.” Another woman then approaches Osweiler. He shoves her away with a forearm, somewhat forcefully. Osweiler then walks toward the second woman and says, “What are you gonna do? What are you gonna do?”

Osweiler turns and walks toward a van, carrying a gigantic pizza box. A man emerges and shoves Osweiler from behind, nearly sending him into the van. The guy who shoved Osweiler then says, “What the f–k you doing, dude? You trying to fight a chick? Get the f–k out of here.”

The first woman responds, “He’s not doing anything. He’s not doing anything.”

Osweiler wisely doesn’t engage the man, but it remains to be seen whether the NFL will take issue with Osweiler shoving away the woman who approached him.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
22,982
Name
mojo
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...rock-osweiler-scuffle-emerges-at-tmz/#content

Video featuring Brock Osweiler scuffle emerges at TMZ
Posted by Mike Florio on March 7, 2016


As Broncos quarterback Brock Osweiler commences the process of negotiating, through agent Jimmy Sexton, with other teams perhaps interested in paying him more than the Broncos are offering, TMZ has posted a video of a Saturday scuffle outside of a Scottsdale, Arizona pizza shop.

The video begins with a woman pointing to Osweiler and saying, “He’s right here. Say it to his face.” Another woman then approaches Osweiler. He shoves her away with a forearm, somewhat forcefully. Osweiler then walks toward the second woman and says, “What are you gonna do? What are you gonna do?”

Osweiler turns and walks toward a van, carrying a gigantic pizza box. A man emerges and shoves Osweiler from behind, nearly sending him into the van. The guy who shoved Osweiler then says, “What the f–k you doing, dude? You trying to fight a chick? Get the f–k out of here.”

The first woman responds, “He’s not doing anything. He’s not doing anything.”

Osweiler wisely doesn’t engage the man, but it remains to be seen whether the NFL will take issue with Osweiler shoving away the woman who approached him.
I'm just going to quote someone who commented on this story.
This discipline society that has emerged over the last few years is super exhausting. Why does every little crappy cell phone video article end with discussing what discipline should be involved? How about none. It’s always about discipline, fines, and finger pointing now and it’s just getting so predictable and old.
200.gif
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2016/03/28/...ans-free-agency-no-contact-rule-should-change

Would You Give $37 Million to a Guy You’ve Never Met?
The rule preventing prospective free agents from talking with teams means the Texans handed Brock Osweiler the keys to their franchise pretty much sight unseen. A slight tweak—creating a free-agent visiting period—is an easy, and sensible, fix
by Peter King

In 2014, the Denver Broncos hosted the Houston Texans for a couple of days of practice during training camp. At one point during the sessions, Texans coach Bill O’Brien sidled up to the Denver quarterback group to speak with Peyton Manning and got to meet his backup, Brock Osweiler, briefly. Just a quick hello.

Until Osweiler signed with the Texans on March 9, that 10-second niblet of time was the extent of the personal interaction between the quarterback and the three men most important to his success in Houston. The owner, Bob McNair, agreed to guarantee $37 million to Osweiler without ever meeting him.

The head coach, O’Brien, never got to speak to Osweiler during the free-agency period, to look him in the eye and find out if he was the man O’Brien wanted to build his offense around. The hands-on offensive coordinator, George Godsey, never got to drill Osweiler on his strengths, weaknesses and how he might fit into the Houston scheme.

But it’s not as if the Texans brass were being reckless with such a critical decision. It’s that league rules forbid any direct contact between a player and a prospective team before the official opening of free agency.

That Houston signed Osweiler to a $72 million contract without actually interviewing him and getting a feel for the kind of person he is … well, it’s insane. It’s like Warren Buffett hiring a CFO for Berkshire Hathaway by watching a couple of appearances of the candidate on “Squawk Box” and “Mad Money,” then committing $15 million a year to the hire.

I was going over all the various shirt-pocket notes (an old expression by the former Steelers radio voice, Myron Cope) from the league meetings just ended, and my conversation with O’Brien on this subject really stuck out. Here’s a third-year coach of a rising franchise, a bright guy with quarterbacks, a branch of the Bill Belichick coaching tree, and he just made a decision with far-reaching and quite stark consequences.

If he’s right on Osweiler, and the Peyton Manning protégé turns into a pretty good player, Houston should be a contender for the AFC South crown for several years to come. If O’Brien is wrong on Osweiler, the decision could cost O’Brien, his staff and other Texans scouts and front-office people their jobs.

It’s inconceivable to me that the NFL would think this impersonal disconnect is a smart way for teams to do business.

brock-osweiler-broncos-texans-free-agency-rules.jpg

Photo: Steve Nehf/The Denver Post via Getty Images
Rules prevented Osweiler and the Texans from talking until free agency officially opened, by which point he’d already signed with Houston.

“There really should be a period where, say a week before free agency, a guy can make some trips,” O’Brien said. “Without that, you have to find a way to research guys, but without seeing him and talking to him face-to-face, there’s always going to be something missing.”

Would owners hire coaches without meeting them? Would Roger Goodell hire a league vice president without meeting him or her? In either case it would be football malpractice.

Contrast the free agency rules to the draft process. Each NFL team can host 30 players at its facility and put those prospects through a battery of non-field tests and interviews. This was one way in which then-Bucs offensive coordinator Dirk Koetter got comfortable with Jameis Winston a year ago; during Winston’s visit, Koetter challenged him, saw that Winston responded well to it, and reported to GM Jason Licht that he liked what he heard and saw out of the quarterback.

Tampa Bay was probably going to take Winston anyway with the first pick, but the interaction between Winston and the man who would coach him daily was a piece to the puzzle that was vital for Licht.

A free-agency visit system would not be difficult to organize. Four or five days before the start of free agency, the NFL would set up a legal tampering period for agents, teams and players. No player would be allowed to sign a contract before the opening of free agency, though agents and teams could discuss terms.

Currently, there is a 52-hour window—two days and four hours—in which agents and teams can talk about a free-agent player’s services. But the player himself can have no contact with anyone from a team other than the one he just played for, until the free-agent market opens.

There’s a reason for this—it’s to give a player’s most recent team every chance to re-sign him. Laudable, to a point. But does a team need nine full weeks to try to re-sign its own player? That’s the length of time between the end of the 2015 regular season and the beginning of the legal tampering period, when agents and other teams can legally communicate but players can’t.

There’s no need to take all that time. Why not shorten that period to eight weeks? It would hurt nothing, and would allow a few days for players to visit prospective teams and meet the head coaches and position coaches they would have to work with.

When I mentioned this idea to one assistant GM, he told me a story of buyer’s remorse between a team and a free agent whom the coaches hadn’t met before he was signed. The remorse began during training camp, then continued during the season. “I have no way of knowing if the same situation would have happened had they met the guy before signing him,” the assistant GM said, “but they certainly would have been able to feel him out and get to know him a little before committing to sign him.”

It’s not going to be a perfect system. But what if a player like Osweiler has some little idiosyncracies that turn a prospective new coach off, and may turn off some of the teammates he’s being asked to lead? You might not be able to find out everything about a guy those in a visit of a few hours, but you’ve at least got a fighting chance to test him.

I defy you to find one coach or owner who likes a system that has them doling out millions of dollars to people they know less than a practice-squad tackle signed in Week 16. Players would also get a better idea whether a particular team and its staff is the right fit for them.

O’Brien did as much fact-finding as he could on Osweiler. He watched tape of every game Osweiler played in Denver. He grilled Osweiler’s college coordinator, Noah Mazzone, who loved Osweiler. He paid attention to the impressive game Osweiler played against New England on a Sunday night in crunch time.

He was sold, and told owner Bob McNair and GM Rick Smith he really wanted Osweiler. Smith did the deal, and three hours before the market opened, Osweiler sent word to agent Jimmy Sexton that he was picking Houston. Sexton then called the Texans.

Even at the moment Osweiler committed to the Texans, he couldn’t talk with them.

There’s one more roadblock to the Texans staff and Osweiler getting to know each other quickly. Upon signing, Osweiler was allowed to have a press conference in Houston, meet his new bosses and have short non-football sessions with them, but under the terms of the 2011 collective bargaining agreement, there can be no football classroom sessions until the start of the Texans’ offseason workout program, on April 18.

The first two weeks of the program are limited to four hours per day, mostly strength and conditioning work. On May 2 Osweiler will start three weeks of on-field and classroom teaching sessions. Then, beginning May 23, the Texans have four weeks of non-contact practices and classroom sessions. After that, the players are dismissed for five weeks, before training camp starts in the last week of July.

“So we’ll have nine weeks [plus camp] to get him ready,” O’Brien said.

O’Brien was allowed to give Osweiler the team’s playbook (on a team-issued tablet) to study, but the coach can’t have any contact with his new quarterback until the offseason program begins. So for five full weeks after signing, Osweiler can’t call Godsey or O’Brien with questions about nomenclature or offensive philosophy.

It all seems pointlessly hard, particularly for the player who will have more to do with the success or failure of the 2016 and 2017 Texans (and, they hope, far beyond) than any other. The least the NFL can do is give teams a chance, before they hand the future of the franchise a $37 million guarantee, to ask simple questions like this: “Uh, are we going to be able to get along?”