Bucky Brooks; Back off Jared Goff!

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Florida_Ram

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Messages
2,622
  • bucky_brooks-110726_65.jpg

  • By Bucky Brooks
  • NFL Media analyst
  • Published: May 25, 2017
Former NFL player and scout Bucky Brooks knows the ins and outs of this league, providing keen insight in his notebook. Back off Jared Goff!

IS JARED GOFF A BUST? Let's all take a deep breath

In the Twitterverse, the trolls would have you believe that the Rams' QB1 is an abject failure based on his disappointing first seven games as an NFL starter. Sure, the 2016 No. 1 overall pick failed to win a game while completing just 54.6 percent of his passes with a 5:7 touchdown-to-interception ratio and a 63.6 passer rating.

But what if I told you that, despite his slow start, he is following a path that could make him a two-time Super Bowl MVP and four-time Pro Bowl selectee?

If you're a Rams fan, take solace in the fact that Goff's slow start surpasses Eli Manning's early days as an NFL starter. In 2004, Manning completed just 48.2 percent of his passes, throwing six touchdown passes against nine interceptions and producing a pedestrian 55.4 passer rating. He posted a 1-6 record during that span, struggling to find his rhythm as a rookie starter.

Eventually, Manning became comfortable within the Giants' system and was able to rely on his solid supporting cast to help him grow into an upper-echelon quarterback capable of driving his team to the winner's circle.

This is crucial to remember when thinking about Goff, especially considering that the Rams just brought in a new head coach with a system and a plan in place that should help the second-year player significantly progress.

Goff's success starts with coach Sean McVay and his version of the spread formation, which features West Coast offense principles. Without seeing the Rams practice yet, I'm basing my opinion on how the young offensive guru built the offense in Washington to enhance the strengths of his quarterback (Kirk Cousins) and incorporate the talents of the supporting cast.

While Goff might be familiar with the schematics of McVay's system (the QB directed a "Bear Raid" offense at Cal that featured some basic West Coast offense principles like Y-stick, snag and mesh), it might be the condensed verbiage that most helps a quarterback who never called a play in the huddle as a collegian, taking in calls off placards from the sideline.

Speaking to a Rams executive recently, I was told that the team's play calls are "not as wordy" as they've been in the past, and McVay has done a great job of lightening the load on the quarterback's shoulders.

"We had some play calls with as many as 12 to 15 words," the Rams exec said. "It's hard for a young quarterback who has never had to make a play call to spit out a long play call to his teammates, remember all of the alerts and checks, and know exactly what he is supposed to do at the line of scrimmage and post-snap. ... McVay has tried to scale back on some of the verbiage to help him get in and out of the huddle faster. It should also help him digest the information quicker and be a more decisive player at the line."

With young quarterbacks, it is important to free their mind from clutter to help them allow their talents to shine. Trimming the verbiage will certainly help Goff play faster, but alleviating some of the responsibilities on his shoulders should help him focus on being a more effective and efficient player at the position.

Naturally, the toughest transition for most young quarterbacks is understanding pass protection and deciphering coverage.

They can work hand in hand with the safety rotations tipping off the potential extra rushers on a play. Some schemes leave it up to the quarterback to audible or change the play or protection in those instances, while other systems incorporate built-in answers with hot reads (quarterback targets a designated receiver or running back on a short route or flare pass against a blitz) or sight adjustments (designated receiver runs to a void created by a blitzing defender on the second level).

Based on how Cousins attacked blitzing defenses in Washington, it appears he was asked to find the hot read or sight adjustment that's built into the route. Considering how Goff countered blitzes in a similar fashion in college, he should be comfortable identifying and targeting the designated blitz-beater within the route.

From a personnel standpoint, the Rams' new receiving corps will also help Goff make a significant jump as a sophomore. After watching their receivers struggle mightily in 2016, the Rams added Robert Woods and Cooper Kupp to the group during the offseason.

Woods, a fifth-year pro with 203 career receptions, is a slick route runner capable of playing outside or in the slot. Although his career numbers (2,451 receiving yards and 12 touchdowns) suggests that he isn't a marquee pass catcher, Woods was consistently open on a variety of short and intermediate routes when I studied the game film. He not only gained sufficient separation from defenders, but he was able to use a wide array of stems and top-of-the-route moves to shake free from coverage.

Kupp, whom the Rams took at No. 69 overall in this year's draft, was viewed as one of the cleanest route runners in his class after a spectacular career at Eastern Washington. Scouts raved about his "high football IQ" and work ethic as a collegian, and he has already impressed NFL folks with his diligence and attention to detail.

"We needed dependable and reliable pass catchers on the perimeter," the Rams executive told me. "The quarterback needs to know that his top targets are going to be where they're supposed to be, when they're supposed to be there. Woods and Kupp will be in the right spots. That alone will help Goff become more consistent."

Although many observers wouldn't consider Woods or Kupp A-level receivers, there are plenty of teams that have succeeded with solid B-level pass catchers in a West Coast system that creates opportunities for polished route runners. Thus, the Rams' passing game could flow smoothly without a true No. 1 on the field.

Now, I didn't forget about Tavon Austin as a possible option as the team's WR1, but he has yet to even come close to a 1,000-yard receiving season through four pro campaigns. Most importantly, he hasn't carved out a niche as a vertical threat or catch-and-run specialist. With Austin currently sidelined due to injury, we'll see if McVay can eventually work the diminutive playmaker into the passing game as a big-play threat.

Speaking of playmakers, the Rams have a pair of them at the tight end position in Gerald Everett (a second-round pick in April) and Tyler Higbee (a fourth-rounder in 2016). The duo could help Goff become more efficient as a quick-rhythm passer, playing pivotal roles as TE1 and TE2 in an offense expected to be more "tight end-centric," according to NFL Network's Steve Wyche.

The move to a multi-faceted tight end attack is sensible, given the unique athleticism that Everett and Higbee bring to the table. Plus, the double-tight end set creates problems for the defense because it allows the Rams to utilize a power running game with Ace (single back with tight ends on opposite sides) or Tight-Wing (single back with both tight ends on the same side).

Not to mention, the team can incorporate a number of movement-based passes off play-action fakes (bootlegs) to attack the defense with three-level reads (post, crosser and flat).

The Rams can also flex either tight end out to form a spread set out of "12" personnel. This is something the Redskins frequently utilized with Jordan Reed under McVay to create mismatches on the perimeter.

Considering the athleticism and route-running skills of Higbee and Everett, the Rams can spread opponents out to allow Goff to play "small ball" (quick game), giving the young quarterback an opportunity rack up completions and stay in manageable situations.

Obviously, the presence of a strong running game would also help Goff become a better player in his second season. For that to occur, the Rams need Todd Gurley to rediscover his mojo as a feature back. After bursting onto the scene as a rookie with at least 125 rushing yards in his first four NFL starts, the 2015 Offensive Rookie of the Year hasn't cracked the 100-yard mark in 18 straight games.

No other running back since the 1970 NFL-AFL merger has played all of his team's games and averaged as many carries per game as Gurley (17.4) without reaching 100 rushing yards at least once in a season, according to NFL Research.

If Gurley re-emerges as a dominant threat in the backfield, the Rams can allow Goff to act as more of a manager than a playmaker for the offense. This certainly won't appease observers expecting a young quarterback to throw the ball all over the yard, but the majority of second-year field generals still need to operate under a tight pitch count (25 passes or fewer) until they are able to show their coaches they can handle more responsibilities as the offensive leader.

In the end, Goff's success will ultimately come down to whether the Rams can build a system around his talents that allows him to showcase his strengths as a quick-rhythm passer.

If McVay can quickly identify what his young passer does well and feature concepts that allow him to stay in his lane, Goff will eventually show off the talent that made him the No. 1 pick in the draft. If the team can identify and develop a supporting cast that enhances the young quarterback's game, the wins will start to pile up and the naysayers will quickly forget about the slow start that had some uttering the "B" word after just seven starts.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...infused-bucs-will-rampage-back-off-jared-goff







 

Dxmissile

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
4,526
I hate arguments like this. Look at what he did,look at what he did to me that's garbage. It's too many variables that comes to play. Yeah Eli and Peyton started off slow they had terrible rookie years but that doesn't mean that's the route Goff is going to take. I think we all hope that he turn it around but don't say "back off" and base your argument on what other players have done.
 

rams56

Bleeding Rams Blue and Gold
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
527
Name
Steve
I'm fine with this argument... I can see what Bucky is saying....and the strong possibility of this happening..... and 7 games does not decide Goffs future path.....;)

Go Rams........ ;)
 
Last edited:

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,459
Name
Dennis
I am looking forward to training camp and preseason to get a better feel on the offense, Goff and his growth, but it's not difficult to see and hear the difference in Goff. IMHO, he knows he has coaches that can put him in a position to succeed and an offensive line that can actually keep him upright.
 

ramfan46

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
1,290
Derek Carr lost his first 10 starts. The pocket passers are gonna take a bit more time to learn the game and find their groove. I think Goff improves tremendously this season. Will be interesting to watch him execute and grow in this offense. McVay and Co. will still be figuring out who's good at what well into the middle of the season.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
15,985
.

Haha, 12 to 15 words. The Jeff Fisher "set the rookie up to fail" offense.

.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
15,985
I hate arguments like this. Look at what he did,look at what he did to me that's garbage. It's too many variables that comes to play. Yeah Eli and Peyton started off slow they had terrible rookie years but that doesn't mean that's the route Goff is going to take. I think we all hope that he turn it around but don't say "back off" and base your argument on what other players have done.

For the love of.

The argument is most rookies struggle in their first year.

.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
38,708
I'm fine with Bucky saying this but I also say with part of me screw you Bucky he's one of the ones this off season criticizing Goff saying the Rams need the QB of the future still. I didn't read it all mainly because of Bucky's past comments though.
 

Dieter the Brock

Fourth responder
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
8,196
I think i got the narrative:

Goff is a bust
Trubisky is a bust

Dak Prescott is the second coming and won't have a sophomore slump whatsoever

And In 2018, just Insert Josh Rosen, Sam Darnold, the Wyoming kid's name cause they are all busts too

Yeah i get it, everyone sucks and you fuckers called it first, thanks for your sports journalistic POV. So freah and new and insightful
 

Merlin

Enjoying the ride
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
37,219
I hate arguments like this. Look at what he did,look at what he did to me that's garbage. It's too many variables that comes to play. Yeah Eli and Peyton started off slow they had terrible rookie years but that doesn't mean that's the route Goff is going to take. I think we all hope that he turn it around but don't say "back off" and base your argument on what other players have done.

For me it's not about needing to "back off." It's about "stop being stupid by holding Goff to unrealistic expectations."

He had a crap OL. Crap WR corps. Crap offensive staff. Plus historically if you look at all the greatest QBs there is zero correlation between starting hot as a QB and greatness. It's idiotic what he's had to deal with from media members being unrealistic.
 

jetplt67

Oh, I have slipped the surly bonds of earth...
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
1,006
I am certainly not a Goff apologist but, give me a break. Anyone who played within the Fisher offense should be judged accordingly. I saw enough to think he has a good (if not better) future in the NFL.
 

Merlin

Enjoying the ride
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
37,219
I really like the idea of the 12 personnel and can't wait to see it...

RB Gurley - big play ability from the backfield.
WR Woods - possession option who can execute sight adjustments.
WR Kupp - bigger possession option who can do the same but also get YAC.
TE Higbee - huge target with good catch radius, will run option routes for Goff
TE Everett - elusive with the ball, will be a big play threat once he knows offense, McVay will keep him in space.

Kupp is 6'2", Higbee is enormous, Everett is a big receiver with RB skills, all of a sudden Rams are putting big targets out there for their QB who all have hands and should be where they're supposed to be. Plus Gurley if he regains his rookie form... Real nice look on paper.
 

Dxmissile

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
4,526
For the love of.

The argument is most rookies struggle in their first year.

.

No he said "what if I told you this path leads to a 2 time Super Bowl winner and 4 time pro bowl selection my problem with this is that he don't need to make comparisons to other QBs who started slow he could simply say improve the team around him and you will see him improve. But trying to tie Goff slow starts and compare them with others who have gone on and had great success is futile.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
23,002
No he said "what if I told you this path leads to a 2 time Super Bowl winner and 4 time pro bowl selection
Nice try, that's not what he said.
What he did day was:
"But what if I told you that, despite his slow start, he is following a path that could make him a two-time Super Bowl MVP and four-time Pro Bowl selectee?"
Big difference between the two statements, he's not saying his path leads there, just saying it could.
Its a good comparison, there are many parallels between the 2 players seasons, although Manning got to watch Kurt Warner play and not Case Keenum.
 

Dxmissile

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
4,526
Nice try, that's not what he said.
What he did day was:
"But what if I told you that, despite his slow start, he is following a path that could make him a two-time Super Bowl MVP and four-time Pro Bowl selectee?"
Big difference between the two statements, he's not saying his path leads there, just saying it could.
Its a good comparison, there are many parallels between the 2 players seasons, although Manning got to watch Kurt Warner play and not Case Keenum.

That's still implying that because he had a slow start he could be a Super Bowl winner, well no duh, but don't try to spin his historically bad start as sign of good things to come. That's like saying because Dak had a good first season don't expect it to last because Vince young won rookie of the year and now he's out of the league. That reasoning is garbage imo you're better off stating the reasons why he can become successful instead of he is "following the path" like everybody wanna start off bad
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
23,002
That's still implying that because he had a slow start he could be a Super Bowl winner, well no duh, but don't try to spin his historically bad start as sign of good things to come. That's like saying because Dak had a good first season don't expect it to last because Vince young won rookie of the year and now he's out of the league. That reasoning is garbage imo you're better off stating the reasons why he can become successful instead of he is "following the path" like everybody wanna start off bad
Why don't you try reading the article... All he's saying is that he "could" be following the path of Eli Manning who was equally horrible as a rookie and turned it around. Yes, he was horrible as a rookie, would you rather read an article that just wants to discuss that?
The parallels to Manning's season are quite remarkable, and for anyone who wants to see Goff bounce back it is a positive path to embrace. Of course I suppose there are those who don't want him to succeed and will just crap on any/every article that puts a positive spin on the outlook for this year. I guess its up to you which group you are in
 

tomas

Pro Bowler
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
1,835
Name
tomas
Jeff Fisher: You stupid, ignorant son of a bitch, dumb bastard ...
987ff87b4625ab141301c43227b80a7e.gif
 

Dxmissile

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
4,526
Why don't you try reading the article... All he's saying is that he "could" be following the path of Eli Manning who was equally horrible as a rookie and turned it around. Yes, he was horrible as a rookie, would you rather read an article that just wants to discuss that?
The parallels to Manning's season are quite remarkable, and for anyone who wants to see Goff bounce back it is a positive path to embrace. Of course I suppose there are those who don't want him to succeed and will just crap on any/every article that puts a positive spin on the outlook for this year. I guess its up to you which group you are in

lol I did read the article or maybe you don't like hearing a difference of opinion about the 0-7 savior and for the record I never have said I didn't want Goff to succeed me believing someone else on the roster is better doesn't mean I don't want him to succeed and if you bothered to actually read my first post I clearly said that.

I'm sure you know how paragraphs work right with the structure and title sentences. He deliberately tried to link Goff struggles with those of Super Bowl winning QBs who had similar struggles stated that he was following the path. Like everyone should be following that path in order to win a Super Bowl that's ridiculous and like I also stated it's fine to make that correlation but when that's your topic sentence in a article you make everything about that particular topic. It's would have been completely different if he reversed his article by starting with the reasons why Goff can succeed despite is poor start then at the end stating - after all we have seen guys start slowly only to end up being a 2x Super Bowl champion, instead he made it seem like every rookie QB that starts slowly is the next Eli and Peyton Manning